Description
Hello Writer, I have attached the document where you can view the sources i used in m first paper this is a follow up assignment pleases read the attached docuement in order to complete this and also pay attention to the instructions below .Audience Analysis Summary of Assignment:
Task: Write a brief analysis of the intended audience for the Six Source Essay. Please complete
this
material as labor for an A grade.
Length: 600 words (2 pages, double-spaced)
Format: APA 7
Point of view: The audience analysis will be written from the first-person point of view.
One of the challenges that writers face when composing new work is the issue of the
audience. Who is the audience? Is it my instructor, my editor, or my colleagues? Is my
audience myself alone? Of course, the first audience that any writer composes is his/her/their
self. The first voice that they hear as they compose the words on the paper is their own. The
primary audience is the person expressing the ideas. A writer asks questions and shapes the
work according to the tastes and expectations of that first, important listener—the self, the
person composing the paper. However, as the work is presented to other people, the
audience for a writer’s ideas expand. Sometimes, practicing writers are confused about how
to shape the material that they are presenting to consider the potential readers. In a course
like WRTG 391, a writer might ask: Is the instructor my audience? Are my peers my
audience? Am I writing for people who are studying in my major? Am I writing for academic
researchers? Imagining potential readers can give the writer insights and inspiration that help
positively shape the final draft.
Here are some questions to help you to prepare for an audience analysis:
● Who are the people who make up my audience (real and imaginary)? What are their
characteristics?
● Do the writing assignment directions give clues about a possible audience for this
paper? ● Who is likely to be interested in the research I am presenting?
● How can I organize my material to make it clear to my audience?
● What part of the research will elicit a response, such as surprise, disagreement, or
support, from my audience?
● What impression do I want to convey about the research that I’ve done?
● How do I want my audience to react to the information in the paper? How do I hope they
will react to the writing that I have done?
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1
Social Media and Political Polarization: Annotated Bibliography
Olamide Olatunji
University of Maryland Global Campus
WRTG 391
2/16/2024
2
Social Media and Political Polarization: Annotated Bibliography
Alodat, A. M., Al-Qora’n, L. F., & Abu Hamoud, M. (2023). Social media platforms and
political participation: A study of Jordanian youth engagement.
The study entails an investigation of political involvement among Jordanian youth and
the use of various social media platforms. It exploreshow Jordanian youth use social interacting
sites for political involvement The researchers utilize a mixed research model to gather data on
political participation behaviors, political attitudes, and social media use patterns. They
meticulouslyinvestigate the level at which social media hinder or facilitate political engagement,
by looking at various factors such as mobilization for collective action, interaction with political
content, and access to information. The researchers contribute to the understanding of the
intricacies of the role of social media in political influence by focusing on a specific
demographic group within a unique political context. Their research findings provide insightsinto
the challenges and opportunities associated with people’s use of social networking sites for
political engagement. They providemeaningful information that augments strategic actions for
enhancing civil engagement and democratic participation in the longrun.
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F., …
&Volfovsky, A. (2018).
The study probes the effect of exposure to different opinions concerning political
viewpoints on social networking sites on political polarization and political participation.
Participants were exposed to political content with unique levels of diversity in perspectives and
viewpoints. The researchers found that this exposure increased polarization among participants
instead of reducing it as expected. Notably, the study challenges the conventional wisdom that
3
exposure to various perspectives improves moderation and understanding of political issues and
challenges. In contrast, people may become highly entrenched in their beliefs through exposure
to diverse views on social networking sites. The material offers compelling evidence that
massively contradicts previous assumptions. The authors shed light on the intricate dynamics of
social media political discourse and reveal the unique limitations of simplistic strategies in
addressing polarization. The findings of the study have enormous implications for researchers,
social media platforms, and policymakers seeking to mitigate the rising political polarization and
enhance democracy through informed participation by the citizenry.
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a
systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188-206.
The systematic review examines the role of social media in enhancing political
polarization. The authors investigate the wide range of mechanisms through which social media
influences political polarization through the spread of misinformation, algorithmic biases, echo
chambers, and selective exposure by conducting a comprehensive and systematic analysis of
existing literature. The article synthesizes findings from meta-analyses, theoretical frameworks,
and empirical studies to offer a clear understanding of the intricate interplay between political
polarization and social media use. It further identifies gaps and provides recommendations for
further studies to refine theoretical models and address unanswered questions.The authors
contribute to identifying key patterns and trends across studies by adopting a systematic
approach to synthesizing research. Their rigorous methodology and comprehensive scope reveal
their credibility and utility for practitioners, policymakers, and scholars interested in addressing
the issue of political polarization. The article serves as an instrumental resource for informing
interventions aimed at solving political polarization and other future research objectives.
4
Lujambio, O. (2023). Diversify the accounts you follow: The effects of social media on
political polarization in Mexico. Available at SSRN 4487784.
The article examines the impact of social media on political polarization in the Mexican
political arena and emphasizes the significance of diversifying the sites individuals leverage and
follow. It highlights the instrumental role of user behavior and algorithmic curation in limiting
exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforcing ideological echo chambers. The chapter also
provides meaningful insights into the various mechanisms through which people’s behaviors and
political attitudes are shaped by social media use through its qualitative examination. Markedly,
the topic of social media’s effect on political polarization is highly relevant and demands further
research. The article is vital in understanding the complex dynamics of political polarization and
communication within the Mexican environment, providing insights that may have broad
implications for practical interventions and scholarly debates. The rigor and credibility of the
research based on its methodological approach, author credentials, and public venue make the
article worth utilizing in research and drawing insights for further studies.
Rathi, M., Ghosh, A., Kumari, S., Sarkar, A., & Das, A. (2021). Influence of social media on
the Political Choice Making: An Exploratory Study.
The study offers an exploratory examination of the impact of social media on political
decision-making processes. The research aims to unravel the interplay between people’s political
choices and social media platforms. The researchers examine the various ways social media
exposure and engagement shape decision-making, including the role of peer influence,
interactions with unique perspectives, and information exposure. They collect robust qualitative
data on individuals’ perceptions and experiences regarding the influence of social media on their
5
political behaviors and preferences. The authors contribute to understanding the intricate
connection between political decision-making and social media use by conducting a thorough
exploratory study. The qualitative model further enables a deep examination of individuals’
behaviors, motivations, and attitudes associated with political engagement on social networking
sites. Practitioners, scholars, and researchers interested in the interplay between politics and
technology may find the article insightful and valuable for informing interventions aimed at
enhancing deliberative and informed political discourse on social media.
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure,
selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns
and expression on social media.
The article examines the interplay between selective exposure, incidental exposure, and
political discourses on social networking sites. The researchers explore the way individuals
navigate online information platforms, exploring both active engagement through information
sharing and passive exposure to political information. They integrate quantitative analysis of
online exposure dynamics with qualitative analysis of user behavior, drawing on theoretical
frameworks. The study offers a nuanced understanding of the way individuals engage with
online political content by integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches. Besides, the
interdisciplinary nature of the study, drawing on core concepts from computer science and
communication, enhances its applicability and relevance to understanding the modern media
environment. The study is also written by recognized authors and posted on reputable websites,
which makes it reliable for use in research. The article makes a remarkable contribution to
advancing knowledge in the field of political behavior and computer-mediated communication.
6
Scholars, researchers, and policymakers alike can leverage the study to inform their discourse on
political polarization, primarily via social networking sites.
7
References
Alodat, A. M., Al-Qora’n, L. F., & Abu Hamoud, M. (2023). Social media platforms and
political participation: A study of Jordanian youth engagement. Social Sciences, 12(7),
402.
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F., …
&Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase
political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 92169221.
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a
systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188206.
Lujambio, O. (2023). Diversify the Accounts You Follow: The Effects of Social Media on
Political Polarization in Mexico. Available at SSRN 4487784.
Rathi, M., Ghosh, A., Kumari, S., Sarkar, A., & Das, A. (2021). Influence of social media on the
Political Choice Making: An Exploratory Study. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative
Inquiry, 12(6).
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure,
selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns
and expression on social media. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 22(6),
363-379.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
