Week 1 Immune System Case

Description

Week 1 immune System Case Study

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Week 1 Immune System Case
From as Little as $13/Page

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Week 1 Case Study Template
Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
1. Identify the correct hypersensitivity reaction:
2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen hypersensitivity reaction:
3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case:
4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case:
Week 1 Case Study Template
Management of the Disease
*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.
1. Identify two strongly recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition
and provide an example (drug name) for each:
2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above:
3. Identify two treatment options that are NOT recommended (I.e., recommended against):
Week 1 Case Study Template
References
[Must be on a separate page and in APA format]
Case Study
Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to apply hypersensitivity pathophysiological concepts to
explain assessment findings of a patient with Allergic Rhinitis. Students will examine all
aspects of the patient’s assessment including: Chief Complaint (CC), History of Present
Illness (HPI), Past Medical History (PMH), Family History (FH), Social History (SH), Review
of Systems (ROS), and Medications and then answer the questions that follow on the
provided Comprehensive Case Study template.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Analyze the case to arrive at the type of
hypersensitivity reaction that the patient is
exhibiting. (CO1)
2. Explain the pathophysiology of the identified
hypersensitivity reaction. (CO1)
3. Identify all subjective and objective
information provided in the case. (CO3)
4. Explain, using pathophysiology, the rationale
for each subjective and objective finding.
(CO1, CO3)
5. Identify two types of medications that are
strongly recommended for the treatment of
allergic rhinitis according to the clinical
practice guidelines on the management of
allergic rhinitis. (CO2, CO5)
6. Explain the mechanism of action of the two
medication classifications and include how the
symptoms of allergic rhinitis are alleviated
when taken. (CO2, CO5)
Due Date
Sunday by 11:59 PM MT of Week 1
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 100 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Content Criteria:
1. Read the case study listed below.
2. Refer to the rubric for grading requirements.
3. Utilizing the Week 1 Case Study
TemplateLinks to an external site., provide
your responses to the case study questions
listed below.
4. You must use at least one scholarly reference
to provide pathophysiology statements. For
this class, use of the textbook for
pathophysiology statements is acceptable.
You may also use an appropriate evidencebased journal.
5. You must use the Clinical Practice Guideline
(CPG) for the management of allergic rhinitis
to answer the treatment recommendation
questions. The guideline can be found at the
following web
address: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.
1177/0194599814561600Links to an
external site..You may also use a medication
administration reference such as Epocrates to
provide medication names.
6. Proper APA format (in-text citations,
reference page, spelling, English language, and
grammar) must be used.
Case Study Scenario
A 35-year-old woman presents to the primary care office with a history of nasal
congestion that has worsened over time and recurrent sinus infections. She considered
herself healthy until about 12 months ago when she began experiencing rhinorrhea,
sneezing, and nasal stuffiness that “seems to never go away”. She noticed that her
rhinorrhea greatly improved when she attended her family reunion on a two-week
Caribbean cruise but returned after being home a few days. She lives with her husband
and 5- year-old child. They have two household pets: a dog that has lived with them for the
last 4 years and a cat who joined the family 1 year ago. Upon exam, the NP observed eyelid
redness and swelling, conjunctival swelling and erythema, allergic shiners (lower lid
venous swelling), Allergic crease (lateral crease on the nose) and inflamed nares.
Case Study Questions
Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
1. Identify the correct hypersensitivity reaction.
2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with
the chosen hypersensitivity reaction.
3. Identify at least three subjective findings from
the case.
4. Identify at least three objective findings from
the case.
Management of the Disease
*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment
recommendations.
1. Identify two strongly recommended
medication classes for the treatment of the
condition and provide an example (drug name)
for each.
2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of
the medication classes identified above.
3. Identify two treatment options that are NOT
recommended (I.e., recommended against).
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Pathophysiology & Clinical
Findings of the Disease
Points
45
%
45%
Description
The student:

Identifies the correct hypersensitivity reaction.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description

Explains the pathophysiology associated with
the chosen hypersensitivity reaction.
• Supports the pathophysiology statement with at
least one appropriate, scholarly reference
(textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology
statements only).
• Identifies at least three subjective findings from
the case.
Identifies at least three objective findings from
the case.
(5 Required Elements)
The student:

Management of the Disease

45
45%
90
90%
Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline
(CPG) to support the chosen treatment
recommendations.
• Identifies two strongly
recommended medication classes for the
treatment of the condition and provides an
example (drug name) for each.
• Describes the mechanism of action for each of
the medications identified.
Identifies two treatment options that are NOT
recommended (I.e.,recommended against).
Total CONTENT Points = 90 pts
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Points
%
Description
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Organization, spelling,
grammar & APA format
10
10%
The student:

Uses the week 1 case study template for case
study responses.
• Provides correct in-text citations for responses
which match the reference page.
• Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format
errors.

Rubric
NR507 Week 1 Case Study
10
10%
Total FORMAT Points = 10 pts
100
100%
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 100 points
NR507 Week 1 Case Study
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked to a
Learning
OutcomePathophysiology &
Clinical Findings of the
Disease
The student:
– Identifies the correct
hypersensitivity reaction.
– Explains the
pathophysiology associated
with the chosen
hypersensitivity reaction.
– Supports the
pathophysiology statement
with at least one
appropriate, scholarly
reference (textbook is
acceptable for
pathophysiology statements
only).
– Identifies at least three
subjective findings from the
case.
– Identifies at least three
objective findings from the
case.
(5 Required Elements)
45 pts
All 5 required
elements are
present
41 pts
1 required
element is
missing.
37 pts
2 required
elements are
missing
23 pts
3-4 required
elements are
missing.
0 pts
All 5 required
elements are
missing.
NR507 Week 1 Case Study
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked to a
Learning
OutcomeManagement of the
Disease
The student:
– Utilizes the required
Clinical Practice Guideline
(CPG) to support the chosen
treatment recommendations.
– Identifies two strongly
recommended medication
classes for the treatment of
the condition and provides
an example (drug name) for
each.
– Describes the mechanism
of action for each of the
medications identified.
– Identifies two treatment
options that are NOT
recommended (I.e.,
recommended against).
45 pts
All 4
elements are
present
41 pts
1 required
element is
missing
37 pts
2 required
elements are
missing
23 pts
3 required
elements are
missing
0 pts
All 4 required
elements are
missing
NR507 Week 1 Case Study
Criteria
This criterion is linked to a
Learning
OutcomeOrganization,
spelling, grammar & APA
format
The student:
– Uses the week 1 case study
template for case study
responses.
– Provides correct in-text
citations for responses
which match the reference
page.
– Has minimal spelling,
grammar & APA format
errors.
Ratings
10 pts
Case study
template is
used for
responses
AND In-text
citations are
correct which
match the
reference page
AND There
are 0-2 errors
in spelling,
grammar or
APA format.
9 pts
Case study
template is
used for
responses
AND In-text
citations are
correct which
match the
reference page
AND There
are 3-5 errors
in spelling,
grammar or
APA format.
8 pts
Case study
template is
used for
responses
AND In-text
citations are
correct which
match the
reference page
AND There
are 6-8 errors
in spelling,
grammar or
APA format.
5 pts
Case study
template is not
used for
responses OR
In-text
citations are
incorrect or do
not match the
reference page
AND There
are 0-5 errors
in spelling,
grammar or
APA format.
0 pts
Case study
template is not
used for
responses
AND/OR Intext citations
are incorrect
or do not
match the
reference page
AND There
are 6 or more
errors in
spelling,
grammar or
APA format.
NR507 Week 1 Case Study
Criteria
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeLate
penalty deductions
Students are expected to
submit assignments by the
time they are due.
Assignments submitted after
the due date and time will
receive a deduction of 10%
of the total points possible
for that assignment for each
day the assignment is late.
Assignments will be
accepted, with penalty as
described, up to a maximum
of three days late, after
which point a zero will be
recorded for the assignment.
Quizzes and discussions are
not considered assignments
and are not part of the late
assignment policy.
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext
Top
Ratings
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Manual Deductions

Purchase answer to see full
attachment