Description
report&presentation
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Abu Dhabi Campus
College of Business
Course Title & Section
Course Code
Assessment Type
Submission Date/Time
Academic Year
Quality Management
0501480
Group Project
13-11-2023
2023-2024-1
Instructor’s Name
Dr. Mariam Farooq
Students ID(s)
Students Name(s)
Q. No.
Total
Marks
Marks
10
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Instructor
Signature
Overall Guidelines
This written project will be completed by the same group of students that were formed at start of
this semester. Each group of students will select a company of their choice and analyze its quality
management practices, tools and approaches. The students will apply the concepts, analytical tools
and frameworks of this course to analyze the firm’s quality management processes, systems, and
practices. At the end, students will also provide their suggestions and recommendations to improve
the quality management systems and practices in the company (if deemed necessary) in the light
of the concepts discussed in the course.
This analysis will primarily be based upon commonly available information about the company on
internet, magazine, trade journals, and library. On the basis of available information, each team
will recommend the actions imperative to improve the quality management systems of the
company.
Here is the tentative outlines and format of the group project.
Format Guidelines:
a. Font: Times New Roman,
b. Font Size: 12
c. Line spacing: 1.5
Contents of the Project:
1. Title Page
a. Al Ain University and its logo etc.
b. Name of the company
c. Names of the students
2. Table of contents
3. Part-1: Brief description of the company, their products etc. (1 page)
4. Part-2: General Concepts of the Quality Management (2-3 pages)
5. Part-3: Analysis of the company (3-4 pages)
a.
b.
c.
d.
Analysis of quality management practices used by the company
Analysis of quality management tools used by the company
Benefits of using quality management practices to the company
Brief discussion of the quality certification obtained by the company (if any)
6. Part-4: Recommendations and conclusion (1 page)
7. References
Presentation:
There will be a presentation for this group project. Each member of the team will present
the analysis of the quality management practices and tools of the company. There will be 20
minutes’ presentation followed by 10 minutes of questions and answers session.
This project will be evaluated using the following rubrics:
Assessment
Indicator
Contents:
30%
Showing
knowledge and
understanding of
key academic
concepts and indepth
understanding of
principles and
concepts
Analysis: 30%
Providing proof of
analytical skills
and critical
thinking by using
critical and
insightful
evaluation,
analysis and
synthesis of issues
and material
including an
original and
reflective
approach of
relevant material
Accomplished
(4)
Developing (3)
Beginning (2)
Below
Standards (1)
Exceptionally
clear, focused,
engaging with
relevant and
strong
supporting
details
Clear focused,
interesting
ideas with
appropriate
details
Main idea may
be cloudy
because
supporting
details are too
general or even
off topic
Development
around the
central idea is
very little
Lack central
idea,
development is
minimal or non
existent
Cover all topics
and goes
beyond obvious
providing deep
insights
demonstrating
excellent
understanding
of issues
involved and
evidence of
extensive
reflection.
Cover all topics,
insights
provided
demonstrating
good
understanding
of issues
involved and
evidence of
reflection.
Misses a few
topics, limited
insights
provided
demonstrating
limited
understanding
of issues and
evidence of
limited
reflection.
Misses a few
topics, a little
insights
provided
demonstrating
lack of
understanding
of issues and
no evidence of
reflection.
Misses several
topics, and
provide no
insight
Exemplary (5)
Applications: 30%
Application of
Course Concepts
Writing: 10%
Logical, articulate
and coherent
structure of
speech (dialogue
and language) or
written work
(comprehension of
grammar, spelling
and language)
Aligns all
analysis with
concepts
covered in
course
(readings)
providing
multiple
examples,
viewpoints,
opposing
points,
analogies, and
integrates
materials from
3-4 external
sources.
No spelling,
punctuation,
and grammar
errors. Word
choice shows
professional
growth &
reflects college
level writing.
Aligns most
analysis with
concepts
covered in
course
(readings)
providing
examples, and
multiple
viewpoints.
Uses at least 2
external
sources.
A couple of
spelling,
punctuation,
and grammar
errors. Word
choice shows
professional
growth
&
reflects college
level writing.
Good Luck
Aligns most
analysis with
course
concepts
(readings)
providing few
examples and
viewpoints.
Uses at least 1
external
source.
Align some of
the analysis
with course
concepts
(readings) or
provide any
examples or
viewpoints.
Uses no
external
resources.
Does not align
answers with
course
concepts. Uses
no external
resources
A few spelling,
punctuation,
and grammar
errors;
word
choice shows
need
for
professional
growth
&
college
level
writing.
Considerable
spelling,
punctuation,
and grammar
errors; word
choice shows
need for
professional
growth;
difficult to
read; lack of
proofreading.
Not readable,
Many spelling,
punctuation,
and grammar
errors
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
