Description
Multi-part assignment help needed. Plz read carefully and following instructions as per rubric
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Week 3
All parts 1, 2, 3 4 is to be done separately
Part 1
This paper is an opportunity to find your interest with vulnerable groups and review
theories and perspectives, including their relationship to understanding and interpretation
of diversity and the difference in human experience and its environmental factors.
This assignment will give you the opportunity to select from a range of issues that affect
vulnerable groups.
You will review a theory and perspective
You will understand and be able to interpret diversity and human behaviour/experience in
the human environment as different.
Below are suggestions of oppressed groups that you might want to consider. These are
only suggestions and other groups can be considered:
• Differences in education attainment between non indigenous and indigenous people
• Drug use/abuse
• Poverty rates of seniors
• COVID 19 and Nursing homes and health
• Poverty for single parents
• Equal access to health care
• Children and mental health in the educational system/home
• Human trafficking
Part 1 continued instructions
This paper will include:
• Minimum three books, professional papers or journal articles that will
articulate/describe an aspect of the topic selected. – 12 points
• Identify one or two techniques or strategies that authors suggest as helpful in working
with this population. – 4 points
• Ethical considerations – identify theories implied or not implied of human behaviour in
these resources. – 4 points
• Review of social, cultural, environmental impact – What does the author suggest as
main clinical or other issues facing this population – 4 points
• Consideration of micro, macro, mezzo impact – What did you learn about this
population? – 4 points
• Approach indicated by the author and is the approach client centred allowing for self determination in terms of personal decision making and goal setting? Would you be
comfortable using this approach taking into consideration your knowledge of this
population, theory or personal value conflicts. – 4 points
• Personal lessons learned in reviewing this topic i.e.: personal values – does it fit or not
fit, stereotypes that you might have held before this review – Did any of your readings
change your current values, beliefs, ideas, stereotypes? – 4 points
• What is your comfort level following this review in using this approach? – 4 points
• This paper will be 4-5 pages followed by APA format for resources used and will include
full citation.
Theory and Perspectives Related to a Vulnerable
Group (Part #1) Rubric
Content
Quality of Information
Relates to topic,
detailed, and accurate
12 points
Research
Quality
Information from
reputable sources
4 points
Research
Quality
Information from
reputable sources
4 points
Content
Overview
Topic and length
4 points
Content
Terminology
Appropriate
vocabulary and
terminology
4 points
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Below Expectations
All information was
clear and came from
reputable sources.
Extensive details
and relevant
examples were used
to support the
content.
Used relevant
information.
Included many
details and strong
examples that came
from reputable
sources.
Information related
to the topic, but
project needed more
details and
examples to fully
support ideas.
Information did not
include details or
examples that
related to the topic.
Information did not
come from a reliable
source.
Included facts,
conclusions, and
opinions from
reliable sources.
Included opinions of
subject-matter
experts
Included facts,
conclusions, and
opinions from
reliable sources.
Included a mixture
of facts from
reputable sources
and opinions from
unreliable sources.
Included more
opinion than fact.
Information was
taken from
unreliable sources.
Included facts,
conclusions, and
opinions from
reliable sources.
Included opinions of
subject-matter
experts.Ethical
Considerations
discussed
Included facts,
conclusions, and
opinions from
reliable sources.
Ethical
considerations
discussed
Included a mixture
of facts from
reputable sources
and opinions from
unreliable
sources.Ethical
Considerations
discussed
Included more
opinion than fact.
Information was
taken from
unreliable
sources.Ethical
considerations
discussed
Extensive details
and relevant
examples. All
information was
accurate and
delivered effectively.
Terminology made
the ideas in the
project clear.
Subject knowledge
was
evident.Included
details and
examples to answer
the essential
question. Creative
design or delivery.
Used proper
terminology and
vocabulary.
Information related
to the topic, but
assignment needed
more details and
examples to fully
support ideas. Work
showed little
student
understanding Use
of the wrong
terminology to
describe the topic.
Information did not
include details or
examples
from
reliable
sources.
Information was not
sufficient in review
of social, cultural
and
or
environmental
impact.
Used
inappropriate
terminology
or
vocabulary.
Used terminology
and
provided
content for micro,
macro,
mezzo
impact. Gave the
viewer clues to the
meaning of terms.
Used terminology
that made the ideas
in the micro, macro,
mezzo impact clear.
Used vocabulary the
viewer could
understand.
Used the wrong
terminology to
describe micro,
macro, mezzo
impact. Used jargon
that made content
hard to understand.
Used terminology or
vocabulary that is
inappropriate for the
topic and micro,
macro, mezzo
impact
Content
All information was
clear and came from
reputable sources.
Extensive details
and relevant
examples were used
to support the
content.
Used relevant
information.
Included many
details and strong
examples that came
from reputable
sources.
Information related
to the topic, but
assignment needed
more details and
examples to fully
support ideas.
Information did not
include details or
examples that
related to the topic.
Information did not
come from a reliable
source.
Treatment of others
Treatment of others
At times, used
Student was unable
was thoughtful.
Proper care for others, Comments were
encouraging.
things, and self
Student took care to
identify personal
4 points
lessons learned
while reviewing this
topic.
was thoughtful.
Student followed
rules about
materials used.
Student took care to
identify personal
lessons learned
while reviewing this
topic
improper language
and inappropriate
remarks. Student
had
limited
understanding and
did not clearly
identify personal
lessons
learned
while reviewing this
topic.used,
to identify personal
lessons learned and
or stereotypes in
review of this topic
Organization
Assignment
was
complete, accurate,
and on time. Work
was turned in early
or on time. Comfort
level after review of
using this approach
was discussed in
overview.Paper was
organized,
thoughtful and well
written.
Finished
assignments
on
time.Completed all
required tasks on
schedule. Comfort
level after review in
using this approach
was discussed in
overview.Paper
was organized and
well written. Few
errors.
Assignment was
late.
Limited
information
of
comfort level in
using
this
approach
after
review
was
discussed.Paper
was organized and
well written. Few
errors.
Assignment was
late.
Did not
discuss comfort
level in using this
approach
after
review
was
discussed. Paper
was
not
well
organized and had
errors.
Included
facts,
conclusions,
and
opinions
from
reliable
sources.
Included opinions of
subject-matter
experts. APA cited.
Included facts,
conclusions, and
opinions from
reliable sources.
APA cited.
Included a mixture
of facts from
reputable sources
and opinions from
unreliable sources.
APA not cited
appropriately in
reference.
Included more
opinion than fact.
Information was
taken from
unreliable sources.
APA not cited
appropriately for any
of the references.
Quality of Information
Relates to topic,
detailed, and accurate
4 points
Behavior
Respect
Overview
Ready for classwork
4 points
Research
Quality
Information from
reputable sources
4 points
Created at Rubric-Maker.com
Part 2
Hilton, C.A. (2021). “The Nature of Wealth”
(A) How do you define abundance (the kind of abundance that best contributes to happiness
and quality of life)? What is it that makes a community prosperous in your eyes? What
makes a community worth living in?
(B) Cullen, D., Castleden, H., & Wien, F. (2021) The Historical Roots of Social Assistance: An
Inadequate Response to the Colonial Destruction of Mi’kmaw Livelihood in Nova Scotia.
After reading about the cultivation of dependence in Mi’kmaw communities in Nova
Scotia, are you aware of any similar history in your own community? What parallels
exist between the history of Mi’kmaw communities and your own? What are some key
differences that you may be aware of (if any)? How might this history have impacted
the social cohesion of Indigenous communities that we spoke about in Week 2?
Part 3 A and B
EVIDENCE IN ACTION CCSA annual report 2018–2019
1.
What was the total cost of substance use and its consequences in Canada in 2014?
2.
Provide 3 examples of where changing the language used may actually save lives.
3.
What are the top 4 substances misused in Canada, based on cost?
4.
What is a national community of practice?
5.
What are adverse childhood experiences (ACE)?
6.
Pick one of the topics from the first 5 questions and research the subject more broadly
than the report. Can you find a more recent copy of the report? Have things changed? What do
other people say about this issue? What do you think about the issue?
(B) Two readings below: provide 4 key points, 3 quotes, 3 key terms, 1 key thing I learned for each
article.
(a) Healing journey Indigenous men’s reflections of resources and barriers to mental health
wellness
(b) Developing an Inn Framework for Health Research
Part 4
What might John Borrows say would be a “good society” or “good societies” according to his
narration of Anishinaabe law inaakonigewin and ethics? Describe what might the relationships look
like between nature, land, Indigenous people, and non-Indigenous people. Please provide an
example to illustrate. (Hint: This is a hard question. Borrows’ text is a dense but insightful one. Give
it a try and don’t be afraid to get it wrong. We all get it wrong sometimes during our lives.)
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
