NUR691 Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes (Week 4)

Description

his section of your change project paper should include:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
NUR691 Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes (Week 4)
From as Little as $13/Page

A reference to the project’s benefits in terms of cost, time, and/or quality that address needs or changes, results, impacts, or consequences that the project has on people, programs, or institutions.
Goals and objectives that are measurable, shared, and hypothetically agreed on by all key stakeholders. They are directly linked to the concept of project success factors.
What variables need to be considered and and whether or not you have control over them.
For example, if you were to implement a clinic-wide practice change, would budget be an issue and how would you address that variable?
If you were to implement your study, consider how would you gather data. Would you choose the qualitative or quantitative method?
An explanation of what your research will provide to the community, or to social change.
A description of the desired outcomes: Specifically, state the purpose, focus, and viewpoint of the project as well as its expected accomplishments.
While you may not be implementing your project, you should have a goal in mind that relates to solving your problem.
Establish a timeline for accomplishing your project goal(s).

This section should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference page, and should address the intended outcomes of your project. You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly articles.

Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.

Points: 75

Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Rubric

NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 4: Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes

NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 4: Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

60 to >49.2 pts

Meets Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are well developed and clear and thorough. Aims include detailed examples of projected features and functions. Values include implementation benefits for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes expertly state the purpose, have a quality focus, and clearly describe the benefits that are expected to occur as a result of implementation.

49.2 to >45.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are somewhat clear but may be vague in places. Aims include somewhat vague examples of projected features and functions. Values include only general implementation benefits. Desired outcomes state the purpose, have a general focus, and generally describe the benefits that will occur as a result of implementation.

45 to >35.4 pts

Falls Below Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are somewhat clear, but lack many key details.

35.4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The content is generally unclear. There is no clear evidence of what the project, aims, values, or desired outcomes are, or there might just be a list of project objectives.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Meets Expectations

Content is well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Approaches Expectations

Content is overly wordy or lacking in specific language. Information is reasonably organized and communicated.

5.63 to >4.43 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Content is disorganized in many places and it lacks clarity.

4.43 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Content lacks clarity and information is disorganized, or may be an outline or a list.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Approaches Expectations

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

5.63 to >4.43 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

4.43 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 pts

Total Points: 75

PreviousNext