Description
please see the attahced pdf for the following instructions
Unformatted Attachment Preview
CIS360 – Systems Analysis I
Unit 2 Assignment: SWOT Group Assignment
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 2
Points: 100
Overview:
The COVID-19 epidemic has impacted the way organizations and individuals do
business. Some of these adaptations may become permanent, offering unique
advantages and opportunities. After you do some individual research and some group
brainstorming, prepare a SWOT Analysis for Post University in this pandemic era.
Instructions:
•
•
•
•
This is a group assignment.
o You will be assigned a group in Blackboard.
o You will collaborate with your group members to prepare the SWOT.
o Your participation for the assignment will be based on the quality of your
contributions in the group chat.
As a group, you will prepare a SWOT analysis for Post University and their
response to the pandemic.
o You will be assessing Post, not as a student, but as an expert analyzer.
You can easily create the SWOT graphic in a Word document or from an editable
template you found online.
You will submit along with your SWOT graphic, a two-page explanation of your
SWOT and your rationale for highlighting the noted points.
Requirements:
•
•
•
One submission per group in a Word document in APA format.
No more than two pages in length.
You will include a reference page for any references used.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 2 Assignment
CRITERIA
SWOT Graphic
Deficient
0 – 5 points
The graphic is
missing or poorly
constructed.
Needs
Improvement
6 – 7 points
The graphic is
missing key details.
Proficient
8 – 9 points
The graphic is
missing minor
details.
0 – 8 points
The strengths
analysis is missing
or poorly written.
9 – 11 points
The strengths
analysis is missing
key details.
12 – 14 points
The strengths
analysis is missing
key details.
Weaknesses
The weaknesses
analysis is missing
or poorly written.
The weaknesses
analysis is missing
key details.
The weaknesses
analysis is missing
key details.
Opportunities
The opportunities
analysis is missing
or poorly written.
The opportunities
analysis is missing
key details.
The opportunities
analysis is missing
key details.
Threats
The threats
analysis is missing
or poorly written.
0 – 5 points
Personal
contributions are
missing, poorly
written, or are only
echoing what
others have said.
The threats
analysis is missing
key details.
6 – 7 points
Personal
contributions are
made in the group
chat but lack
originality and have
key errors and
omissions.
n/a
The threats
analysis is missing
key details.
8 – 9 points
Quality, personal
contributions are
made in the group
chat with only
minor errors or
omissions.
Significant errors
that do not impede
professional
presentation.
Few errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.
Strengths
Collaboration in
the group chat
Paper Length
Clear and
Professional
Writing and APA
Format
Less than two
pages.
Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.
n/a
Exemplary
10 points
The graphic is
thoughtfully created
and gives a visual
summary of the
paper.
15 points
The strengths
analysis is logical,
complete, and
thorough.
The weaknesses
analysis is logical,
complete, and
thorough.
The opportunities
strengths analysis is
logical, complete,
and thorough.
The threats analysis
is logical, complete,
and thorough.
10 points
Personal
contributions in the
group chat are of
high quality, original,
and offer solid,
logical ideas for the
assignment.
Two pages.
Writing and format
are clear,
professional, APA
compliant, and errorfree.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
