Project Charter Form

Description

For this assessment, you will populate the three parts of the Project Charter template with detailed information (use the Topic Approval form attached).

Use the Project Charter Proposal Checklist [PDF] to ensure all content is included (don’t fill out the checklist). Faculty will use the checklist to provide additional feedback.

Part I includes these sections:
Project Name.
Project Site.
Contact at Site.
Preceptor.
Executive Sponsor.
Gap Analysis.
Evidence to Support the Need.
PICOT.
Project Aim.
Part II includes these components:
Stakeholders.
Team Leader.
Team Members.
Communication Plan.
Consider questions like these in your communication strategy: Will you hold an in-person or video conference-kickoff meeting? How will you communicate with all involved parties (email, telephone, periodic meetings, project tools, et cetera)?
Planned Intervention(s).
Framework.
Proposed Outcomes.
Part III includes these sections:
Data Collection and Management.
Data Analysis.
SWOT Analysis and Business for Project.

In addition to populating your Project Charter, create a data collection sheet and submit that along with your Project Charter. A data collection sheet is a tool that is used to collect and organize data. It can also be defined as a worksheet that helps you to collect, process, and make sense of information from multiple data resources. For your data collection sheet, please create it in Excel. This will be used for collecting and analyzing your data.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Project Charter
After reviewing the detailed assignment instructions in the course for each of the Project Charter components, use this template to
complete your project charter, replacing the instructional text in the cells with the required information.
PLEASE NOTE. THIS PROJECT:
1. Cannot be implemented and measured until after you have IRB approval from Capella and your site if indicated. The gap
analysis for the Project Charter is a retrospective data analysis. So, you cannot make your whole project a retrospective data
analysis, as it is just a small part of planning the project.
2. Sections need to be written in a narrative with grammatically correct sentences, unless indicated in the specific section.
Part 1
Project Charter Information
Project Name
Create a title for your Project Charter. Make the title specific and distinct from other projects so
the reader knows the goal and wants to learn more!
Project Site
Name you approved project site and department within the site.
Name with credentials:
Contact at site
Organizational Email:
Phone Number:
Name with credentials:
Preceptor
Email:
Phone Number:
Executive Sponsor
Identify this person by role and title (no names) and briefly describe why this person was
selected (rationale for the selection).
1
Discuss the current practice for the practice problem, such as the current the policy/procedure
or what is currently done. Explain the background and significance of the proposed practice
problem with the organization.
Explain how you identified the “gap” or opportunity for change.
Gap Analysis
Provide empirical and contextual evidence to support the gap, need, or improvement. National
data and internal data at YOUR research site. This needs to be very specific and actual data.
Describe the desired condition.
Include your Gap Analysis tool as an appendix to this document (examples includes RCA,
Fishbone, DMAIC).
Evidence to Support the
Need
Consider primary and secondary data sources, regulatory requirements, clinical practice
guidelines, and benchmarking data to support your proposed intervention or practice change.
Include 3-4 citations (published within the last five years) that substantiate the gap or problem
exists and why improvement is needed. The citations need to support your proposed change in
practice.
PICOT
Develop a problem statement (1-2 sentences): Current state, identified problem/gap and the
desired or expected state.
Project Aim
Describe the overarching aim (goal/outcome) of the project, including the goals, the anticipated
impact on the population/system/organization, why you are addressing it
(importance/relevance) and pertinent background or historical information.
Part II
Stakeholders
Stakeholder
Identify the key stakeholders for your project. Think of key stakeholders (internal and external).
This might include patients/clients, families, community leaders and organizations, health
agencies, systems within the organization etc. List between 3-4 potential stakeholder members
Initials or ficitious name
Title, Role or
Affiliation.
Connection to
the project.
Potential impact
(how affected).
Contribution to
the project.
Barriers or
anticipated
challenges if any
2
Identify the team leader by initials and/or fictitious name and primary role within the
organization. Be sure to complete the interactive media in Week X before completing this
section. Include the following:
Team Leader
•
Why you selected this person to lead the team.
•
Useful qualities this leader might leverage for success (consider emotional intelligence
and communication/collaboration attributes).
•
Discuss how an effective leader in this context might address ethical practices,
diversity, equity, and inclusion in leading the team and the quality improvement effort.
•
Leadership style(s) or approach(es) to be utilized.
•
Identify two different leadership approaches that might be utilized to lead the team.
Briefly describe the approaches using 1-2 citations/references (published within the last
five years) for support.
•
Explain why you selected these two approaches.
•
Think about your own experience and leaders that have been most effective. Assess
when different situations might necessitate different approaches in developing and
implementing your Project Charter. Provide an example of how the leader might utilize
each of the approaches you selected in practice.
3
Team Members
Identify 4-6 team members (initials or fictitious name), department or affiliation and credentials
or qualifications. Think about how a diverse set of individuals (demographics, disciplines,
experiences, knowledge) will add to the team!
Describe each team member’s title, department or affiliation, qualifications/credentials and the
rationale for inclusion and how the person contributes to the project’s success.
Title
Department or
Affiliation
Credentials or
Qualifications
Rationale for
selection/Contribution
to the project
Communication Plan
Develop a communication plan for each person associated with the Project Charter, e.g., Executive Sponsor, Stakeholders,
Team Leader, Team members.
4
Team
Member/Stakeholder.
Purpose of
communication
(Inform, share,
engage, solicit
information?).
Frequency and
timing of
communication.
(How often,
specific stages
of project?)
Method of
communication
(consider
audience,
method, culture,
language,
inclusion).
Who is
responsible for
the
communication
to this member?
(Why is it
important who
delivers the
message?)
Potential
challenges/
barriers or
assets with
communication
(barriers,
language,
culture, different
disciplines, best
practices (cite
the literature 1-2
sources as
needed).
5
Intervention and Measurement
Planned Intervention
Evidence supporting the intervention needs to be provided. A minimum of five evidence- based
resources required (for example, research articles, clinical practice guidelines, consensus
statements). Describe the planned intervention including:
•
Describe 2-3 interventions that can be applied in this practice change
•
Interventions identified are consistent with the synthesis of the literature.
•
There is logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice
recommendation to the proposed intervention of the project.
•
Defines the intervention very specifically and operationally so that anyone replicating
this project could apply the same intervention.
•
Scope of work detailing week by week what will be done and estimated hours (include
as appendix).
•
Appropriate appendices are included.
Improvement Model / Framework
Identify and briefly describes theoretical framework or conceptual model for improvement. Provide rationale for why the
model was chosen and how it is a good fit for the project (you will be connecting this to the project intervention later in
9901).
Proposed Outcomes
Metric (What is being
measured to determine
success):
Outcome Measure (What is
the desired outcome in
measurable terms):
Process Measure (Are you
doing the right things to get
to the outcome? Are the
steps in the process leading
to the planned outcome?):
Balancing Measure (Are
the changes being made
causing problems in other
areas?):
6
Part III
Data Collection & Management
Develop a plan for the collection, management, and stewardship of the data you will collect for your Project Charter.
Describe the data
to be collected
Who will collect it?
When will it be
collected?
Develop a
timeline.
How will the data
be stored?
How will the data
be protected?
Who will have
access?
Consider aspects
related to
diversity, equity,
and inclusion. Is
the data stratified
by gender, race,
ethnicity, age,
disability,
socioeconomic
status? How might
this information be
utilized to address
population health,
equity and health
disparities? Use
citations as
needed to support
your conclusions.
Data Anaylsis
7
•
Describes project design (example: quality improvement project).
•
For each outcome measure define method of analysis.
•
Describe the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of any instruments, tools, surveys, or questionaires
used; status of permission to use instruments. If the instrument is not public, permission to use the instrument is
attached as an appendix.
SWOT Analysis and Business for Project
Think about how this project benefits the target population, the organization, and those served. Complete the SWOT
Analysis.
Strengths
Project strengths: What are the assets of the organization that will help it achieve a successful outcome, e.g., knowledge,
support, resources, funding, etc.?
Weaknesses
Potential obstalces or challenges: What are the potential barriers that might interfere with success? In the past, what factos
were aligned with lack of success, and obstacles to change?
Opportunities
Opportunities to facilitate project success: What are the strengths? How might these translate into opportunities for
change?
Threats
Potential threats: Identify potential threats to the success of the project, e.g., competition, factors beyond your control, etc.
8
NURS-FPX9100 Topic Approval Form
Learner name:
Date:
01/03/2024
Iteration:
Faculty Name:
Reviewer’s Name:
Decision:
Date:
LEARNER INSTRUCTIONS
This screening form is intended to help you and your faculty ensure the project topic and
methods meet the requirements for the DNP final project. Include APA Citations where noted in
this form. Please include an APA reference list at the end of the document. Links to relevant
resources have been provided throughout the document. The Faculty/Reviewer will provide
feedback directly on this form along with recording the decision to endorse or defer the topic
WORKING PROJECT TITLE: Enhancing Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Referral
Rates through the Implementation of Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to
Treatment (SBIRT) Tools
Primary Investigator:
Project Site: Banyan Health System, Miami Florida
1
Sponsor:
Preceptor: Dr Moraima Trujillo, MD, MBA – Chief Medical Officer – Senior Vice President,
Other support;
Jordana Reid, M.A. Director of Employee Development and Compliance
Samantha Morris – DBH, LMFT – Vice President of Clinical Affairs
Yuleisis Mendez – MAT Program Manager
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PICOT: For the community mental health center providers (P), how does the required per-visit
implementation of the Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
tools (I) compared to current practice (C) affect the Referral rate to Medication-AssistedTreatment (MAT) program (O) over 12 weeks (T)?
Brief Summary: The prevalence of alcohol misuse among individuals seeking mental health
services at Banyan Health System is a pressing concern since co-occurring substance use
disorders, especially alcohol misuse, pose challenges for effective Medication Assisted
Treatment (MAT) services. It is currently difficult for providers in the Banyan Health System to
quickly screen and refer patients to the Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) program, as there
is no established process for doing so. This shortage highlights the need for a well-planned
solution to be implemented promptly. Providers who utilize Alcohol Screening, Brief
Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) tools can more effectively connect individuals
with MAT programs (O’Brien et al., 2019). Therefore, integrating routine Alcohol Screening,
2
Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) tools into standard care protocols offers
an opportunity for early identification and referral to the proper healthcare service. This project
addresses the need for enhanced Alcohol Screening and Referral rate to the MAT program at
Banyan Health System.
Primary Objective: Improve the influence of standard integrating routine Alcohol Screening,
Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) tools in the Referral rate to MAT
programs at Banyan Health System.
Secondary Objective:
1. Assess the effectiveness of the SBIRT tool on the community mental health center providers’
ability to identify and refer patients with alcohol problems.
2. Analyze the SBIRT tool’s implementation process and providers’ training, identify
improvement areas, and explore factors that hinder or facilitate its regular use.
3. Evaluate the outcomes of an increased number of individuals seeking Medication-Assisted
Treatment (MAT), including their treatment engagement, retention rates, and overall recovery
success from substance use disorders.
4. Examine the SBIRT tool’s impact on healthcare resources, expenses, and potential cost
savings.
5. Determine healthcare providers’ satisfaction with the SBIRT tool and its impact on the referral
rate to the Alcohol MAT program.
Proposed Evidence-based Intervention(s):
3
1. Implementation of Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
(SBIRT) (Babor et al.,2023).
2. Per-Visit Integration of SBIRT Tools into Provider Workflow (Karno et al.,2021).
3. Standardized protocols for identifying and addressing alcohol-related concerns (Pussig et
al.,2021).
4. Continuous quality improvement processes (Jonas et al.,2021).
PROJECT DESIGN AND METHODS
Project Design: This project will employ a quality improvement design with a quantitative
approach.
Model For Improvement: This project will adopt the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.
Target Population Undergoing the Practice Change: The target population of this project are
healthcare providers in Banyan Health System’s community mental health center.
Inclusion Criteria: Healthcare providers including physicians and nurse practitioners who are
actively engaged in patient care at Banyan Health System’s community mental health center.
Exclusion Criteria: Therapists, pharmacy staff, social workers, and support staff will not be
included in the routine Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention (ASBI) training.
Estimated Project Length (weeks): The estimated project length is 12 weeks.
OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS
Primary Outcome Measures:
4
1. Improved the referral rate to Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) services
effectiveness within the specified project duration.
2. Provider Adherence to SBIRT Protocol
Secondary Outcome Measures
1. Provider Knowledge and Competence in Alcohol Screening (Process)
2. Patient Awareness and Understanding of SBIRT (Outcome)
3. Timeliness of Referrals to MAT Programs (Process)
4. Provider Perception of Implementation Challenges (Process)
5. Patient Satisfaction with Alcohol-Related Interventions (Outcome)
Data Analysis and Results Reporting: Complete the table for each measure listed above. Note
the type of data you will be collecting (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio).
MEASURE
MEASURE
TYPE
TYPE OF DATA
COLLECTED
ANALYSIS
METHOD
RESULTS
REPORTINGDATA TYPE
MedicationAssisted
Treatment
(MAT) Referral
Rate
Outcome
Ratio (Count of
referrals per unit
time)
Comparative
analysis (prepost
implementation)
Quantitative
Provider
Adherence to
SBIRT Protocol
Process
Ordinal (Likert
scale)
Descriptive
statistics, trend
analysis
Quantitative
5
Provider
Knowledge and
Competence in
Alcohol
Screening
Process
Ordinal (Likert
scale)
Descriptive
statistics, prepost
comparisons
Quantitative
Patient
Awareness and
Understanding
of SBIRT
Outcome
Nominal
Frequency
distribution,
percentage
analysis
Quantitative
Timeliness of
Process
Referrals to MAT
Programs
Interval (Time in
hours/days)
Time-to-event
analysis,
comparison of
referral timelines
Quantitative
Provider
Perception of
Implementation
Challenges
Process
Ordinal (Likert
scale)
Thematic
analysis,
identifying
common themes
Qualitative
Patient
Satisfaction with
Alcohol-Related
Interventions
Outcome
Ordinal (Likert
scale)
Descriptive
statistics,
identifying
satisfaction
trends
Quantitative
Rationale for Inferential Statistics:
Incorporating inferential statistics is crucial to evaluate the project’s impact on the organization,
particularly its potential financial implications. Moreover, enhanced identification of alcoholrelated concerns and improved the referral rate to Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)
services may influence patient satisfaction and reimbursement rates, necessitating inferences
from the results for informed decision-making.
To analyze the outcomes of our project, we will use parametric and non-parametric tests
depending on the data type we have. For instance, we will employ a paired t-test to examine any
changes in the providers’ compliance with the SBIRT Protocol and their knowledge of alcohol
6
screening before and after an intervention. This test assumes that the data is usually distributed.
However, if this assumption is not met, we will use alternative tests such as the Wilcoxon
signed-rank test.
In order to study the MAT Referral Rate, a crucial metric, we will conduct a one-way ANOVA.
This test will enable us to compare the average results at different time frames. If the
assumptions of ANOVA are not met, we will use a different test called Kruskal-Wallis. This test
does not require specific data requirements compared to other tests.
Additionally, we will perform correlation studies, such as Pearson correlation for numerical data
that follows a pattern and Spearman rank correlation for data that does not follow a pattern.
These statistical methods will help us investigate the relationship between variables and make
informed decisions on how much money to allocate for a project and if it can be scaled up.
7
References
Atterman, J., Dormond, M., Schreiber, J., Haffajee, R., Andraka-Christou, B., Singer, M., … &
Pozuelos, S. (2018). Behavioral health workforce implementation challenges related to
medication-assisted treatment. Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center
http://www. Behavioral health workforce. Org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/Y2FA3P2_MAT-Full-Report. Pdf. (Accessed 13 June 2020).
Babor, T. F., McRee, B. G., Kassebaum, P. A., Grimaldi, P. L., Ahmed, K., & Bray, J. (2023).
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Toward a public
health approach to the management of substance abuse. Alcohol/Drug Screening and
Brief Intervention, pp. 7–30.
Karno, M. P., Rawson, R., Rogers, B., Spear, S., Grella, C., Mooney, L. J., … & Glasner, S.
(2021). Effect of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for unhealthy
alcohol and other drug use in mental health treatment settings: a randomized controlled
trial. Addiction, 116(1), 159–169.
O’Brien, P., Crable, E., Fullerton, C., & Hughey, L. (2019). Best practices and barriers to
engaging people with substance use disorders in treatment. US, Department of Health and
Human Services, Washington, DC.
8
9
Doctoral Project Charter Proposal Checklist
Instructions: Faculty and Secondary Reviewers will use this checklist to review the charter for your doctoral project. Items checked indicate
the criterion was met. Items NOT checked are either missing or incomplete.
Review the Feedback and incorporate the feedback when revising the Project Charter Proposal. Failure to incorporate feedback may result in
deferral of the proposal. Prior to submitting to IRB, please provide a copy the approved Project Charter and Checklist to the 9902 faculty for
signature
.
Learner Name:
EMPID
Primary Faculty:
Date:
Iteration: 1
Secondary Reviewer
Decision: Approved
NURS9902 Faculty Attestation: I have reviewed the Project Charter for the above named learner and can attest the charter was
approved by two separate reviewers and has not been modified.
(9902 Faculty Name)
Part 1
General Project Information: Clearly describes the people who will be involved in and affected by a project. Description
includes multiple specifics and details that further characterize participants and narrow the focus
Project Name
1
Named the project.
Acronym to identify the project.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Executive Sponsors
List key supporters using initials.
Describes why they were chosen (such as fiscal or political support, useful skills such as marketing ability).
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Departmental Sponsors
List departmental sponsors.
Identifies sponsors departmental roles and why they were chosen to support this project.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
2
Project Aim
Describes the project’s overarching aim.
Include the goals you intend to accomplish impact on systems
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Project Focus
Describes the specific intervention that will be used to achieve the project aim
Intervention is evidence based and appropriate evidence is provided and cited appropriately
Intervention meets the scope and rigor for a doctoral level project
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Project Team
Project
Manager
Describes the relevant skills and experience that qualify the person to lead the initiative.
Describes the project managers primary organizational role
Describes the project managers unique contributions to the project
3
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Describes each team member’s primary role in the organization as well as skills or qualifications that could
contribute to the project’s success.
Team
Members
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Stakeholders
Lists titles, categories, or initials of those who will be affected by project outcomes
Describse the impact on each individual or group.
Identifies impact on patients and consumers, customer satisfaction, safety, and quality outcomes
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer
reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Part 2
Project Overview: Clearly describes an overview of all aspects of a project plan. Description includes multiple specifics; is detailed,
yet concise; and all elements of the plan work together to create a coherent whole.
Project Description
4
Includes concise descriptions of who, what, when, where, and how long.
Describes the problem, how it was diagnosed, and how its solution aligns to strategic priorities.
Includes a timeline and required resources for the project: staff time, administrative resources, activity sites, and so on.
Includes a budget estimate if applicable
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Evidence to Support Need
Provides empirical and contextual evidence to support the gap, need, or improvement and includes organizational data,
Includes primary and secondary data sources, regulatory requirements, clinical practice guidelines, and benchmarking data.
Data and sources are supported by citations and/or personal communications to ensure academic merit and integrity
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Project Purpose/Business Case
5
Describes the business or clinical need the project addresses
Describes the change or improvement and how will it impact consumers, staff, and health care system as a whole
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
SMART Objectives (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-Bound)
Provides a concise list of objectives using the SMART model.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Deliverables
Lists the specific high-level products or processes that will be created, such as training materials, policies, or process improvements.
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Project Scope
Specifies what the project will and will not address.
Includes all relevant people and processes and addresses alignment to strategic organizational goals.
Includes a brief discussion of the project’s limitations.
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
6
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Project Milestones
Describes specific deliverables for each project phase.
Identifies interim milestones including timeframes in terms of number of days, weeks, or months. Identify those responsible for each
deliverable.
Project length meets the requirements for doctoral work (DNP projects must be between 8-10 weeks to allow for enough
data collection and to accumulate the necessary number of practicum hours).
Feedback:
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Part 3
SWOT Analysis: Clearly describes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to a project plan. Description
identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty
Strengths
Identifies project strengths could include things like executive support or financial resources.Write them here.
Weaknesses
Identifies here at least three potential obstacles to a successful project outcome.
Opportunities
7
Identifies current opportunities to facilitate project success
Threats
Identifies at least three current or future threats to the project’s success
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Known Major Risks
Ranks the SWOT weaknesses and threats listed and identifies at least one high risk and discuss how it might be mitigated
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Ethical Considerations: Clearly describes the ethical considerations, constraints, external dependencies, and communication
strategy of a project plan. Description includes multiple specifics, examples, and references to relevant, current scholarly and/or
authoritative sources
8
Describes any potential for human rights violations.
The project does not involve vulnerable populations.
Addresses data security factors and includes a description of how data will be accessed and stored, including team members who will
have access to personal health data and how it will be safeguarded
The project, as described, is NOT Research
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Constraints
Identifies any constraints that may limit the project potential ( i.e. personnel, funding, scheduling, or other options, such as a
predetermined budget, limited staff, or deadlines)
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
External Dependencies
Describes external dependencies such as personnel, funding, communication channels, or community resources, describe them here.
If there are no external dependencies, describes internal support.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
9
Communication Strategy
Indicates here how the project manager will communicate to sponsors, project team, and stakeholders.
Describes the means and frequency of communication, including meetings, processes, and tools such as charts, wikis, and
dashboards.
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Proposed Outcomes: Clearly describes the outcome measures related to a project plan. Plans for each proposed outcome
measure are linked to authoritative evidence.
Describes what is specifically being measured to determine project success
Operationally defines all outcome, process, counter, or proxy measures that will be used to evaluate the success of the project
Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence. Synthesis includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence from peer reviewed sources
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Data Collection Plan: Clearly describes the data collection procedures related to a project plan. Description includes multiple
specifics, examples, and references to relevant, current scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
10
Describes the type of data that will be collect and analytical methods to determine project success
Describes how and when data will be collected per the project milestones described.
Identifies twho will collect, analyze the data and where the data will be stored
Addresses the integrity of the data collection process (will it be done by team members or staff)
Explains the integrity of the data sources.
If using a survey tool, the survey is described in detail including validity and relability testing and permissions.
Describes the plan to handle missing data and how data will be securely stored
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Data Collection Tool
Optional: The data collection tool is included as an Appendix in the Project Charter Proposal Document
DO NOT submit the excel sheet to the assignment / assessment in NURS/NURSFPX9100. The sheet will be reviewed by your faculty
in NURA/NURSFPX9902.
Scolarly Writing and Academic Integrity
Scholarly Evidence and Support: Synthesizes scholarly, authoritative evidence where indicated within the project charter. Synthesis
includes multiple, relevant, and current evidence supporting all parts of the project charter.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
11
Writes clearly and coherently using communication style and vocabulary appropriate for scholarly work (no grammar, usage, or
mechanical errors).
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Correctly references and cites scholarly and/or authoritative sources in APA 7th ed.
Feedback:
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
General Summary Feedback:
Iteration 1
Primary Faculty Name
Iteration 2
Primary Faculty Name
Iteration 3
Primary Faculty Name
12

Purchase answer to see full
attachment