Description
Please explain how the selected condition affects the body on a cellular level. Read the assignment rubric for week 9
Unformatted Attachment Preview
12/19/23, 9:59 PM
Purdue University Global
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
Assignment Introduction
Assignment Directions
Design and develop a 8- to 12-slide PowerPoint presentation using voice/narrative feature on each slide (the title and reference slides do not count
in the slide count, but must be included in the assignment), that will be used to educate the community about one of the following topics:
Type II Diabetes
Atherosclerosis
Hypertension
Depression
Urinary Tract Infection
Narrative, PowerPoint Contents to include, but not be limited to:
Risk factors and causes
Possible consequences
Prevention Strategies
Treatment Modalities
PowerPoint Format:
Follow APA 7th edition format for PowerPoint presentations.
Use the slide notes section in the presentation to include information that follows your narration, being sure to follow the conventions of
Standard English.
Slide content should include brief points that identify the areas that will be addressed in the narration.
In-text citations should be included with any brief points that were researched from outside sources, and the narration should fully explain the
points.
Reference all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of the presentation and cite each source in the body of the presentation using
7th edition APA format.
Identify the sources of any pictures you use, being sure to cite them correctly in 7th edition APA style, using in-text citations.
Narration Guidelines:
Maintain a professional tone by summarizing observations and evaluations for each slide.
Ensure that your presentation is highly ordered, logical, and unified.
Words should be clearly enunciated and professional tone should be sustained throughout the presentation narration.
Audio recording should be free of background noise and interruptions.
Before finalizing your work, it is important to:
Review Narrative PowerPoint Assignment Requirements (described above) and the Narrative PowerPoint Grading Rubric (under the Course
Resources), to ensure you have completed all required elements of the assignment.
Make sure to review your chosen topic carefully to make sure you have answered all content effectively.
Utilize spelling and grammar checks to minimize errors.
Follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
Make sure your presentation is original, insightful, and utilizes your logic and critical thinking skills; that your presentation is well-organized, with
superior content, style, and mechanics.
Utilize APA 7th edition format.
Be diligent about APA formatting including paraphrasing and direct quotations, utilizing appropriate in-text citations, and referencing your
sources.
How to Submit
Submit your assignment to the Unit 9 Assignment 2 Dropbox.
When you are ready to submit your assignment select the appropriate Unit 9 Assignment 2 Dropbox. Make sure to save a copy of the assignment
you submit. Please be sure to confirm that your file uploaded correctly.
To see your assignment instructions and grading rubric, go to Course Resources/Grading Rubrics.
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/273504/viewContent/16475712/View
1/1
12/19/23, 10:00 PM
Purdue University Global
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
Assignment Introduction
Assignment Directions
For this assignment, you will be developing and presenting an Educational, Narrative PowerPoint. In the presentation of your chosen topic, be sure
to examine the pathophysiological factors that influence the incidence and manifestations of acute, episodic, and chronic diseases in populations
across the lifespan (MN551-3).
Narrative, PowerPoint Assignment Requirements
Make sure all of the content topics of the assignment have been addressed.
Cite at least three references in your PowerPoint; this may include peer-reviewed journal articles, textbooks, or evidence-based practice
websites to support the content.
All reference sources must be within 5 years.
Do not use sources such as Wikipedia or UpToDate as a reference.
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/273504/viewContent/16475712/View
1/1
Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Criteria 1
Level III Max Points
Points: 50
Level II Max Points
Points: 40
Level I Max Points
Points: 30
Not Present
0 Points
Content Quality
●
●
●
●
One of the assigned
Unit 2 case study
topics for assignment
paper: Cell Function
and Growth,
Inflammation,
Infection, or Immunity
is chosen.
Displays complete
understanding of all
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions
thoroughly, utilizing
evidence-based
practice.
Supports opinions and
ideas with evidencebased practice details
and examples where
appropriate.
●
●
One of the
assigned Unit 2
case study topics
for assignment
paper: Cell
Function and
Growth,
Inflammation,
Infection, or
Immunity is
chosen.
Displays
understanding of
case study critical
concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 1-2
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
●
●
●
One of the assigned Unit
2 case study topics for
assignment paper: Cell
Function and Growth,
Inflammation, Infection,
or Immunity is chosen.
Displays understanding
of patient case study
critical concepts by
answering all case study
questions; there may be
3-4 questions with
errors/omissions or lack
of detail.
Opinions and ideas may
indicate misconceptions
or little understanding of
one or more critical
concepts.
●
Does not meet
the criteria.
examples where
appropriate.
Criteria 2
Level III Max Points
Points: 8
Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4
Collegiate-level
academic writing
●
●
●
●
●
●
Includes no more than
three grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors that
do not interfere with
the readability.
Meets the assignment
paper length
requirement of at least
four full content pages,
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Supports all opinions
and ideas with
relevant and credible
reference sources of
information.
Provides three or
more peer-reviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference sources
are within the past five
years.
●
●
●
●
Criteria 3
Level III Max Points
Points: 7
Includes no more
than four
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Supports many
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
credible sources of
information.
Provides two peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references
sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
Level II Max Points
Points: 5.6
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8
●
●
●
●
●
Includes five or more
grammatical, spelling,
and punctuation errors
that makes
understanding parts of
assignment difficult, but
does not interfere with
readability.
Meets the assignment
paper length
requirement of at least
four full content pages,
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Not all references
utilized are relevant
and/or credible sources
of information.
Provides one peerreviewed or evidencebased practice scholarly
references source.
Reference sources are
within the past five
years.
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.2
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet
the criteria.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Citations and
Formatting
●
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is clear
and contributes to the
meaning of the
assignment.
There may be 1-2
sentences, or one
paragraph that is out
of order, or other
minor organization
issues.
Strong attempt at APA
formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
One or two formatting,
in-text, or reference
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks and
citations make
authorship clear.
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 3-4
sentences, or two
paragraphs that
may be out of
order, or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Overall attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
3-4 formatting, intext, or reference
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
generally, make
authorship clear.
●
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is confusing
in places due to 5-6
sentences or three
paragraphs that may be
out of place, or other
organization issues that
interfere with the
meaning or intent of the
paper.
Attempts to use APA
formatting and citing. 5-6
formatting, in-text, or
reference citation errors
may occur.
Quotation marks and
citations may be missing
or incorrect.
Authorship may be
unclear in areas.
Maximum Total
Points
65
52
39
0
Minimum Total
Points
53 points minimum
40 points minimum
1 point minimum
0
Does not meet
the criteria.
Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 3 Assignment Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Criteria 1
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Level III Max Points
Points: 50
Level II Max Points
Points: 40
Level I Max Points
Points: 30
Not Present
0 Points
Content Quality
●
●
●
One of the
assigned Unit 3
case study topics
for assignment
paper: Hemostasis,
Red Blood Cell
Disorders, or
Cardiovascular
System is chosen.
Displays complete
understanding of all
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions
thoroughly, utilizing
evidence-based
practice.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
●
●
●
One of the
assigned Unit 3
case study topics
for assignment
paper: Hemostasis,
Red Blood Cell
Disorders, or
Cardiovascular
System is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
case study critical
concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 1-2
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
●
●
●
One of the assigned
Unit 3 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Hemostasis, Red
Blood Cell
Disorders, or
Cardiovascular
System is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
patient case study
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 3-4
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of detail.
Opinions and ideas
may indicate
misconceptions or
little understanding
of one or more
critical concepts.
Criteria 2
Level III Max Points
Points: 8
Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8
Collegiate-level
academic writing
●
●
●
●
Includes no more
than three
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
●
Includes no more
than four
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
●
Includes five or
more grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that makes
understanding parts
of assignment
difficult, but does
not interfere with
readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
●
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Supports all
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
credible reference
sources of
information.
Provides three or
more peer-reviewed
or evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
●
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Supports many
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
credible sources of
information.
Provides two peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references
sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
●
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Not all references
utilized are relevant
and/or credible
sources of
information.
Provides one peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references source.
Reference sources
are within the past
five years.
Criteria 3
Level III Max Points
Points: 7
Level II Max Points
Points: 5.6
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.2
Citations and
Formatting
●
●
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is clear
and contributes to
the meaning of the
assignment.
There may be 1-2
sentences, or one
paragraph that is
out of order, or
other minor
organization issues.
Strong attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
One or two
formatting, in-text,
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 3-4
sentences, or two
paragraphs that
may be out of
order, or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Overall attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
3-4 formatting, intext, or reference
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 5-6
sentences or three
paragraphs that
may be out of place,
or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Attempts to use
APA formatting and
citing. 5-6
formatting, in-text,
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks
and citations make
authorship clear.
●
●
●
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
generally, make
authorship clear.
●
Quotation marks
and citations may
be missing or
incorrect.
Authorship may be
unclear in areas.
Maximum Total Points 65
52
39
0
Minimum Total Points
40 points minimum
1 point minimum
0
53 points minimum
Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 6 Assignment Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Criteria 1
Content Quality
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Level III Max Points
Points: 50
Level II Max Points
Points: 40
Level I Max Points
Points: 30
Not Present
0 Points
●
●
●
One of the
assigned Unit 6
case study topics
for assignment
paper:
Acid/Base,
Respiratory,
One of the assigned
Unit 6 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Acid/Base,
Respiratory, Renal,
One of the assigned
Unit 6 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Acid/Base,
Respiratory, Renal,
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
Criteria 2
Collegiate-level academic
writing
Renal, or
Gastrointestinal
Disorders is
chosen.
Displays
complete
understanding of
all critical
concepts by
answering all
case study
questions
thoroughly,
utilizing
evidence-based
practice.
Supports
opinions and
ideas with
evidence-based
practice details
and examples
where
appropriate.
Level III Max Points
Points: 8
●
●
Includes no more
than three
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation
errors that do not
interfere with the
readability.
Meets the
assignment
paper length
requirement of at
least four full
●
●
or Gastrointestinal
Disorders is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
case study critical
concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 1-2
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
●
●
or Gastrointestinal
Disorders is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
patient case study
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 3-4
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of detail.
Opinions and ideas
may indicate
misconceptions or
little understanding
of one or more
critical concepts.
Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8
●
●
●
Includes no more
than four
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the cover
●
Includes five or
more grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that makes
understanding parts
of assignment
difficult, but does
not interfere with
readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
●
Criteria 3
Citations and Formatting
content pages,
excluding the
cover page and
reference
page(s).
Supports all
opinions and
ideas with
relevant and
credible
reference
sources of
information.
Provides three or
more peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice
scholarly
references
sources.
All reference
sources are
within the past
five years.
Level III Max Points
Points: 7
●
●
The overall order
of information is
clear and
contributes to the
meaning of the
assignment.
There may be 12 sentences, or
one paragraph
that is out of
order, or other
minor
●
●
●
page and reference
page(s).
Supports many
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
credible sources of
information.
Provides two peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
●
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the cover
page and reference
page(s).
Not all references
utilized are relevant
and/or credible
sources of
information.
Provides one peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references source.
Reference sources
are within the past
five years.
Level II Max Points
Points: 5.6
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.2
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 3-4
sentences, or two
paragraphs that
may be out of order,
or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 5-6
sentences or three
paragraphs that
may be out of place,
or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
●
organization
issues.
Strong attempt at
APA formatting
and correctly
citing all
reference
sources. One or
two formatting,
in-text, or
reference citation
errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
make authorship
clear.
●
●
Overall attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
3-4 formatting, intext, or reference
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
make authorship
clear.
●
●
Attempts to use
APA formatting and
citing. 5-6
formatting, in-text,
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks
and citations may
be missing or
incorrect.
Authorship may be
unclear in areas.
Maximum Total Points
65
52
39
0
Minimum Total Points
53 points minimum
40 points minimum
1 point minimum
0
Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 7 Assignment Rubric
Unit 7 Assignment
Criteria
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Criteria 1
Level III Max Points
Points: 50
Level II Max Points
Points: 40
Level I Max Points
Points: 30
Not Present
0 Points
Content Quality
●
●
●
One of the assigned
Unit 7 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Hepatobiliary,
Pancreas, Pain,
Visual, or Endocrine
Disorders is chosen.
One of the assigned
Unit 7 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Hepatobiliary,
Pancreas, Pain,
Visual, or Endocrine
Disorders is chosen.
One of the assigned
Unit 7 case study
topics for
assignment paper:
Hepatobiliary,
Pancreas, Pain,
Visual, or Endocrine
Disorders is chosen.
●
Does not meet the
criteria
●
●
Displays complete
understanding of all
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions
thoroughly, utilizing
evidence-based
practice.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
●
●
Displays
understanding of
case study critical
concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 1-2
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
●
●
Displays
understanding of
patient case study
critical concepts by
answering all case
study questions;
there may be 3-4
questions with
errors/omissions or
lack of detail.
Opinions and ideas
may indicate
misconceptions or
little understanding
of one or more
critical concepts.
Criteria 2
Level III Max Points
Points: 8
Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8
Collegiate-level
academic writing
●
●
●
●
●
Includes no more
than three
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the title
page and reference
page(s).
Supports all opinions
and ideas with
relevant and credible
reference sources of
information.
●
●
Includes no more
than four
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the title
page and reference
page(s).
Supports many
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
credible sources of
information.
●
●
Includes five or
more grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that makes
understanding parts
of assignment
difficult, but does
not interfere with
readability.
Meets the
assignment paper
length requirement
of at least four full
content pages,
excluding the title
page and reference
page(s).
Not all references
utilized are relevant
and/or credible
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
Provides three or
more peer-reviewed
or evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
Provides two peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
sources of
information.
Provides one peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references source.
Reference sources
are within the past
five years.
Criteria 3
Level III Max Points
Points: 7
Level II Max Points
Points: 5.6
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.2
Citations and
Formatting
●
●
●
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is clear
and contributes to
the meaning of the
assignment.
There may be 1-2
sentences, or one
paragraph that is out
of order, or other
minor organization
issues.
Strong attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
One or two
formatting, in-text, or
reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks and
citations make
authorship clear.
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 3-4
sentences, or two
paragraphs that
may be out of order,
or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Overall attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
3-4 formatting, intext, or reference
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
generally, make
authorship clear.
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 5-6
sentences or three
paragraphs that
may be out of place,
or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the paper.
Attempts to use
APA formatting and
citing. 5-6
formatting, in-text,
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks
and citations may
be missing or
incorrect.
Authorship may be
unclear in areas.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
Maximum Total
Points
65
52
39
0
Minimum Total
Points
53 points minimum
40 points minimum
1 point minimum
0
Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 9 Assignment Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Criteria 1
Level III Max Points
Points: 60
Level II Max Points
Points: 48
Level I Max Points
Points: 36
Not Present
0 Points
Content Quality
●
●
●
●
One of the
assigned Unit 9
topics for
PowerPoint
narration
assignment: Type II
Diabetes,
Atherosclerosis,
Hypertension,
Depression, or
Urinary Tract
Infection is chosen.
Displays complete
understanding of all
critical concepts of
chosen assignment
topic including: 1)
Risk factors and
causes, 2) Possible
consequences, 3)
Prevention
strategies, and 4)
Treatment
modalities.
●
One of the assigned
Unit 9 topics for
PowerPoint
narration
assignment: Type II
Diabetes,
Atherosclerosis,
Hypertension,
Depression, or
Urinary Tract
Infection is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
critical concepts of
chosen assignment
topic including: 1)
Risk factors and
causes, 2) Possible
consequences, 3)
Prevention
strategies, and 4)
Treatment
modalities; there
may be 1-2 critical
●
One of the assigned
Unit 9 topics for
PowerPoint
narration
assignment: Type II
Diabetes,
Atherosclerosis,
Hypertension,
Depression, or
Urinary Tract
Infection is chosen.
Displays
understanding of
critical concepts of
chosen assignment
topic including: 1)
Risk factors and
causes, 2) Possible
consequences, 3)
Prevention
strategies, and 4)
Treatment
modalities; there
may be 3-4 critical
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
●
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
Voice-over
narration was clear
and applicable to
presentation
PowerPoint slides.
Slides presentation
notes section
included
information that
follows narration.
●
●
●
concepts with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Supports opinions
and ideas with
evidence-based
practice details and
examples where
appropriate.
Voice-over narration
was clear and
applicable to
presentation
PowerPoint slides.
Slides presentation
notes section
included information
that follows
narration.
●
●
●
concepts with
errors/omissions or
lack of details.
Opinions and ideas
may indicate
misconceptions or
little understanding
of one or more
critical concepts.
Voice-over narration
was clear and
applicable to
presentation
PowerPoint slides.
Slides presentation
notes section
included information
that follows
narration.
Criteria 2
Level III Max Points
Points: 8
Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8
Not Present0 Points
Collegiate-level
academic writing
●
●
●
●
●
●
Includes no more
than three
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the
assignment length
requirement of 8-12
PowerPoint slides,
excluding the title
and reference
slide(s).
Supports all
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
●
●
Includes no more
than
four grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors
that do not interfere
with the readability.
Meets the length
requirement of 8-12
PowerPoint slides,
excluding the title
and reference
slide(s).
Supports many
opinions and ideas
with relevant and
●
Includes five or
more grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that makes
understanding parts
of assignment
difficult, but does
not interfere with
readability.
Meets the length
requirements of 812 PowerPoint
slides, excluding the
title and reference
slide(s).
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
●
credible reference
sources of
information.
Provides three or
more peer-reviewed
or evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
credible sources of
information.
Provides two peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references sources.
All reference
sources are within
the past five years.
●
●
●
Not all references
utilized are relevant
and/or credible
sources of
information.
Provides one peerreviewed or
evidence-based
practice scholarly
references source.
Reference sources
are within the past
five years.
Criteria 3
Level III Max Points
Points: 7
Level II Max Points
Points: 5.6
Level I Max Points
Points: 4.2
Citations and
Formatting
●
●
●
●
●
●
The overall order of
information is clear
and contributes to
the meaning of the
assignment.
There may be 1-2
sentences or one
PowerPoint slide
that is out of order,
or other minor
organization issues.
Strong attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
One or two
formatting, in-text,
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks
and citations make
authorship clear.
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 3-4
sentences or two
PowerPoint slides
that may be out of
order, or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the
presentation.
Overall attempt at
APA formatting and
correctly citing all
reference sources.
3-4 formatting, intext, or reference
citation errors may
occur.
Quotation marks
and citations
●
●
The overall order of
information is
confusing in places
due to 5-6
sentences or three
PowerPoint slides
that may be out of
place, or other
organization issues
that interfere with
the meaning or
intent of the
presentation.
Attempts to use
APA formatting and
citing. 5-6
formatting, in-text,
or reference citation
errors may occur.
Quotation marks
and citations may
be missing or
incorrect.
Not Present
0 Points
●
Does not meet the
criteria.
●
make authorship
clear.
Maximum Total
Points
75
Minimum Total Points 61 points minimum
Authorship may be
unclear in areas.
60
45
0
46 points minimum
1 point minimum
0
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
