Description
This assignment is to write a 500 word feedback based on the PowerPoint, video and reading list from the Learning module in week 3 or 4.Although this Assessment requires choosing three weeks of content and writing feedback three times. However, this time, you only need to choose one week’s content in the third or fourth week to complete. Only one feedback, 500 words, see “Requirement” for details.However, this course has strict formatting requirements and you need to check all the documentation requirements I have attached. And this course requires all references to be derived from the reading list provided for this course, I will provide you with my school website, student account and password. I will provide you with my school website, student ID, and password. There are reading lists for each unit that you need to review, and the details are still in the “Requirements” file.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Requirement
According to a learning module PPT, reading materials and videos. Write a 500-word
Reflection.
Detail:
learning module
Currently open 3 and 4, you can choose the one you think is good to write
There are learning module PPT, reading materials and videos.
The course teacher for this subject is Sean, and the format is very strict. All references
must come from the Reading list of the subject.
Each module has recommended reference books and these are preferred. (recommend
to use)
For example, if you want to write module 3 Reflection. use module 3’s Reading list.
Or you can use the search bar
All references and intext citations require page numbers.
MGMT3006 – Assessment 1 (In-Class Participation)
Assessment Format: 3 x 500-word written reflections on tutorial discussions
Modules Covered:
Modules 2-11
Due:
Papers due the week after the relevant tutorial
Worth:
25 marks (total)
This is an individual assignment in which you choose three module topics that interest you. For each of
your three chosen modules you will need to submit a 500-word reflection on the discussions that took
place in the tutorial.
Submission will be via Turnitin. There is no late submission for each week’s submission point.
Each submission will need to make close connections with the weekly readings for the chosen module,
supported by citations including page numbers.
Students should submit three such papers (one for each module of their choice), over the trimester. Each
paper will be due by 11:59pm (Perth time) on the Monday of the week following the relevant tutorial.
Each paper will receive a grade and qualitative feedback.
The lowest of the three marks will not count towards the Assessment 1 mark. (If students choose to only
submit two summary papers, then both marks will count towards the assessment mark.)
Each paper for this assessment should be fully referenced but need only refer to the assigned readings.
The summary should include:
1. An overview of the tutorial discussion, including connections with the ideas from the chosen
reading
2. What you thought were the most important points from the discussion
3. Two or three sentences of your own reflections and reaction to the discussions
Assessments submitted for this unit must be within 10% of the stated word count. Any words over the
word count plus 10% will not be read or marked.
Instructions and Advice:
•
•
•
•
•
You can choose any three modules from modules 2-11 to write on
Each summary paper is due at 11:59pm (Perth time) on the first Monday after the
relevant tutorial for the relevant module
Each summary paper should make fully cited connections with the assigned readings for
the relevant module (including page numbers).
The summary papers should be fully referenced, but only need to reference and use the
assigned reading.
You do not need to advise the Unit Coordinator or your lecturer which modules you
choose to write on
For example:
Carlo chooses to write his first reflection paper on the in-class discussion for Module 3. After attending the
tutorial and taking notes, he writes the reflection paper and submits it to the ‘Assessment 1 – Module 3’
Turnitin submission link before 11:59pm the Monday after the class.
Over the course of the semester, he chooses to write reflections on the tutorial discussions and readings
for Module 3, Module 7, and Module 10.
He scores a 7/12.5 for his Module 3 paper, a 9/12.5 for his Module 7 paper and a 10 for his Module 10
paper.
His lowest mark is dropped (the 7 for the Module 3 paper), and his final mark for Assessment 1 is the sum
of the highest two papers (19/25).
Assessment 1 FAQ
Timing: Can I submit a module paper on a tutorial topic more than a week later?
No, the reflection papers for each module need to be submitted by the submission deadline the
following Monday.
For example, if you choose to write one of your papers on Module 2, that must be submitted by the
following Monday. If you wish to submit your first paper in Week 4, it will need to be written about
Module 3 and so on.
Any papers submitted on a topic other than the topic from the previous week will be marked as a
zero.
How does the grading work?
Each paper will be marked out of 12.5 marks. The 25% mark for this assessment will be the
combination of the two highest marks of the three papers. In other words, the lowest marked of the
three papers will not count towards the final mark.
Do we have to submit three papers?
No, if you wish you just submit two papers and have both of those two count towards your unit
mark.
Do we need to tell the teaching team which modules we plan to submit papers for?
No.
Do we have to use citations?
Yes, the Assessment 1 papers need to make user of the assigned readings for the week, that is show
an awareness of what they say and connect some of the key points in the reflection to the readings.
Do I still need an introduction and conclusion since this is such a short word count?
You should have a brief introduction but one or two sentences is more than enough. You do not
need to have a separate conclusion.
Where do we submit the papers?
There is a separate submission link in the Assessment 1 folder in Blackboard for each module. Each
module’s submission link will be available only until the deadline for that module.
When will we get the feedback on the Assessment 1 papers?
Feedback will be returned to you 2 weeks after the deadline for each module.
Can we write in the first person (i.e. use ‘I think’, ‘I found’ etc.)?
Absolutely! You can write in the first person (‘I’) in all assessments in this unit.
I think sometimes those who are averse to letting students write in the first person think it will
tempt students away from a focus on the theories and offering supporting evidence and reasons and
instead towards just opinion. As long as you remember not to do that, then use ‘I’ as much as you
want.
For example – don’t write something like “I just think this is wrong”. Do write something like “this
seems to violate the Categorical Imperative because …” Notice how the second example uses ‘I’ but
is offering reasons from the case and supports this view with evidence.
For citing something such as Freeman’s broad view of CSR how should I put in the page number when
I’m just referencing the theory itself?
In most cases, a theory will be defined somewhere specific in a reference work. This is certainly true
of Freeman.
If you are genuinely referencing something that is covered in a whole work then you do not need a
page number, but this is very rare.
Subject Knowledge (ULO 1,2)
This section is about:
•
•
How well does your work demonstrate your understanding of the key ideas and
theories covered in class?
Does your paper select and apply the most relevant ideas and theories?
Rubric Item
Offers a clear, accurate
overview of the tutorial
discussion.
Identifies clearly and
accurately what you
thought were the most
important points from the
discussion
Clear and well-structured
reflections and reaction to
the discussions
For Assessment 1 this means
• The overview – although
necessarily brief – shows a
strong understanding and
familiarity of what was
discussed in the tutorial.
• Note – a sentence or two may
be sufficient for this.
• Your work explains what of
the tutorial discussion was
most important and why.
• Note this should follow
directly from your overview
(above).
• Your reflection and reaction
build on the two sections
above and show an
understanding of they key
ideas in the discussion.
• These should be specific to
the tutorial discussion, the
module materials and the
readings.
• Note: here and throughout,
you will not be able to cover
all the discussion content but
you should be specific about
what you thought was most
significant and why.
Sources for advice
• Assessment
Overview
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Assessment
Overview
Readings
Learning Modules
Assessment
Overview
Learning Modules
Readings
Revision videos
(Blackboard)
Quality of Argument (ULO 1,2)
This section is about:
•
•
How well does your argument use ideas, reasons, and sources to support the point you
are making?
How well does your paper respond directly to the assessment requirements (rather than
just writing on the topic in general)?
Makes close connections
with the weekly readings
for the chosen module in
response to the
assessment question.
Clearly explains the
reasons for the aspects of
the discussion chosen to
focus on.
•
•
•
•
Reflections and reaction to
the discussions show good
understanding of the
tutorial discussion and
module ideas.
•
•
Make sure your work supports
the claims you make with
supporting evidence from
these materials.
Use and reference correctly
the ideas from the readings to
support these connections.
Offer the reader reasons to
support the claims made. Use
correctly referenced citations
from the readings (including
page numbers) to do this.
Use other forms of evidence if
they are relevant – real world
situation, likely outcomes if a
position was adopted,
analogies, reasoning out to
conclusions.
How are your own thoughts
and reflections here
connected to the key ideas
Be specific in these
connections – what specific
elements of the ideas did you
agree with? Disagree with?
Find useful? Think have
important implications?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Learning Module
Materials
Readings
Revision videos
(Blackboard)
Exemplar Slides
Learning Module
Materials
Assessment Advice
Videos
(Blackboard)
Readings
Exemplar Slides
Learning Module
Materials
Assessment Advice
Videos
(Blackboard)
Academic Standards (ULO 1,2)
This section is about:
•
•
•
•
How strong and clear is the writing?
How well written and presented is your work as a piece of academic work?
Is the use of sources accurate and correct?
This section includes academic integrity but is also much more than that.
Writing is clear and
concise.
•
•
•
Uses correct cover sheet
and format.
•
•
References accurately and
to required assessment
standards.
•
•
•
•
•
Clarity – is it clear what
you are saying?
Does the paper follow a
clear layout?
Does the paper use
correct punctuation and
spelling?
Does the paper have the
set cover sheet with the
correct word count
included?
Does the paper meet all
the layout and content
requirements in the
‘Assessment Overview’
Includes page numbers
for all in-text citations
(paraphrasing and direct
quotes)?
Sources cited really do
say what you say they
do
Direct quotes are clearly
identified as such. Direct
quotes always need to
be indicated as such
with quotation marks.
Reference list at the end
of the paper meets
academic standards –
alphabetised, authors
listed by family name,
correct formatting, DOIs
etc.
Note: for this
assessment you only
need to refer to the
essential reading for the
relevant module.
•
•
Proofread
The Academic
Communication
Development team has
tools to help here.
•
Assessment Overview
and Requirements
document
•
Referencing Checklist
(Blackboard)
Curtin Library
Referencing guides
•
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and Marketing
Unit Outline
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Trimester 1A, 2024
Unit study package code:
MGMT3006
Mode of study:
Internal
Tuition pattern summary:
Note: For any specific variations to this tuition pattern and for precise
information refer to the Learning Activities section.
Lecture: 1 x 1 Hours Weekly
Tutorial: 1 x 2 Hours Weekly
This unit does not have a fieldwork component.
Credit Value:
25.0
Pre-requisite units:
(v.0) or any previous version
Co-requisite units:
Nil
Anti-requisite units:
Nil
Result type:
Grade/Mark
Approved incidental fees:
Information about approved incidental fees can be obtained from our website.
Visit https://www.curtin.edu.au/students/essentials/fees/understanding-yourfees/ for details.
Unit coordinator:
Title:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Location:
Dr
Jacqueline Boaks
08 9266 2629
[email protected]
Building: 402 – Room: 610
Teaching Staff:
Name:
Email:
Sean O’Hara
[email protected]
Administrative contact:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Location:
FBL Support Team
Please email
[email protected]
Building: Please email – Room: Please email
Learning Management System: Blackboard (lms.curtin.edu.au)
Acknowledgement of Country
We respectfully acknowledge the Indigenous Elders, custodians, their descendants and kin of this land past and
present. The Centre for Aboriginal Studies aspires to contribute to positive social change for Indigenous
Australians through higher education and research.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 1 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update
Curtin University is committed to supporting all our students and staff whether they are on campus, working
remotely or overseas. Your health, safety and wellbeing are our priority and the continuing COVID-19 pandemic
may require changes to the unit schedule, learning activities, delivery modes and assessment to provide flexible
and safe options to our community. Curtin will endeavour to keep changes and disruptions to a minimum at all
times. For current advice and further information visit https://www.curtin.edu.au/novel-coronavirus/.
Syllabus
Business and its operations increasingly raise ethical issues that affect all of us, including in new and emerging
areas. This unit considers many of these issues, such as: Should employers be able to access the social media
accounts of job applicants? Do we have a right to know when companies use artificial intelligence to make
decisions about us? Should social media platforms ban hate speech and opinions that are harmful to others, or
should they allow total freedom of speech? Should businesses use child labour in countries where the law allows
it? Or bribes in countries where these are expected? Should there be any limits on the treatment that businesses
can subject animals to in producing food or medicines? Should those in business only be guided by profit or are
there some things that are too unethical to be done even if they are profitable? If there are ethical obligations in
business, how can we decide and agree on these? This unit explores prevailing views on ethical theories and
ethical thinking and invites students to explore their own views on these questions and discuss ethical and moral
dilemmas that arise in business contexts. Students will learn and apply critical thinking skills related to the practice
of business within the framework of societal values.
Introduction
Welcome to Business Ethics (MGMT3006)
This unit draws on well-established traditions of thinking about ethics and applies them to questions of
business and its impact on society and individuals. The unit begins with an introduction to the main ways of
thinking about ethics and about the relationship between business and ethics, before moving on to apply
these frameworks to current and emerging areas of ethical issues for business.
The unit is designed to help students develop the ethical reasoning skills needed to navigate and address
current and future ethical issues in the workplace. There is a strong focus on students discussing ethical
issues with others and identifying and developing their own ethical points of view.
Unit Learning Outcomes
All graduates of Curtin University achieve a set of six Graduate Capabilities during their course of study. These
inform an employer that, through your studies, you have acquired discipline knowledge and a range of other skills
and capabilities which employers would value in a professional setting. Each unit in your course addresses the
Graduate Capabilities through a clearly identified set of learning outcomes. They form a vital part in the process
referred to as assurance of learning. The learning outcomes notify you of what you are expected to know,
understand or be able to do in order to be successful in this unit. Each assessment for this unit is carefully
designed to test your knowledge of one or more of the unit learning outcomes. On successfully completing all of
the assessments you will have achieved all of these learning outcomes.
Your course has been designed so that on graduating you will have achieved all of Curtin’s Graduate Capabilities
through the assurance of learning processes in each unit.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 2 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
On successful completion of this unit students can:
Graduate Capabilities
addressed
1 Investigate the different ethical frameworks used in business
2 Connect theoretical insights on business ethics to practice situations
3 Write clear, concise and coherent arguments relating to ethical theory and
practice in business
4 Present critical accounts of theory and practice in business ethics
Curtin’s Graduate Capabilities
Apply discipline
knowledge, principles
and concepts
Innovative, creative and
entrepreneurial
Effective communicators
with digital competency
Globally engaged and
responsive
Culturally competent to engage
respectfully with local First Peoples
and other diverse cultures
Industry connected and
career capable
Find out more about Curtin’s Graduate Capabilities at the Learning Innovation and Teaching Excellence Centre
(LITEC) website: litec.curtin.edu.au
Learning Activities
This unit follows a lecture and tutorial pattern each week.
The tutorial class will be a mix of in class activities and group discussions.
Each week students will need to read the required readings before the tutorial class. These classes are
designed to deepen your understanding of the key ideas and theories, by discussing and applying them to
real world scenarios. It will be crucial that you understand the ideas before coming to class.
Learning Resources
Library Reading List
The Reading List for this unit can be accessed through Blackboard.
Other resources
There is no required textbook for this unit. Instead, the readings are drawn from some of the most important and
foundational papers written in this area across the fields of ethics, business ethics, and the business press.
All of the readings are available in the Reading List for this unit, accessed via the Blackboard.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 3 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Assessment
Assessment policy exemptions
l
There are no exemptions to the assessment policy
Assessment schedule
Task
Value
%
Date Due
In-Class Participation
25%
Week: Ongoing
Day: Weeks 3-12
Time: 11:59pm
Mondays
Case Study
40%
Reflective Piece
35%
1
2
3
Unit
Late
Assessment
Learning
Assessments Extensions
Outcome(s)
Accepted?* Considered?*
Assessed
1,2
No
No
Week: Week 7
2,3,4
Day: Monday15th of
April
Time: 11:59pm
(AWST)
Yes
Yes
Week: Exam Period 1,3,4
Day: Monday 3rd of
June
Time: 11:59pm
(AWST)
Yes
Yes
*Please refer to the Late Assessment and the Assessment Extension sections below for specific details and
conditions.
Detailed information on assessment tasks
1. Assessment 1: Tutorial Discussion Papers
This is an individual assignment in which you choose three module topics that interest you. For each of
your three chosen modules you will need to submit a 500-word reflection on the discussions that took
place in the tutorial.
Students should submit three such papers (one for each module of their choice), over the trimester.
Each paper will be due by 11:59pm (Perth time) on the Monday of the week following the relevant
tutorial.Submission will be via Turnitin. There is no late submission for each week’s submission point.
Worth: 25 marks
Further Information: Instructions and advice will be given in the first weeks of class and will be made
available in Blackboard under the ‘Assessment 1’ folder.
2. Assessment 2: Case Study (Report format.)
Worth: 40 marks
For Assessment 2 students will be asked to analyse a business ethics case study from current events.
Your report should use and demonstrate an understanding of the key topics, ideas and theories
covered in class. The report is not a research report, rather it needs to make extensive use of the
assigned weekly readings for this unit.
The case and more information will be provided in Blackboard in the first weeks of class.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 4 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
The word count is subject to +10% with no penalty, any words over the word count plus 10% will not
be marked.
3. Assessment 3: Reflective Piece
Worth: 35 marks
The aim of the assessment is to give you an opportunity to reflect on the issues, concepts, and
theories as they relate to your own ethical views and your own future career (real or aspirational).
You will be assessed on how well you can explore, explain, and connect the issues, concepts, and
theories covered in the unit to your own ethical views and future career, using academic sources as
indicated in the assessment requirement document (available on the Blackboard).
The word count is subject to +10% with no penalty, any words over the word count plus 10% will not
be marked.
Pass requirements
To pass this unit, you must receive an overall grade of 5 or above and a mark of 50% or higher.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 5 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Assessment Moderation
Fair assessment through moderation
Moderation describes a quality assurance process to ensure that assessments are appropriate to the learning
outcomes, and that students work is evaluated consistently by assessors. Minimum standards for the moderation
of assessments are described in the Assessment and Student Progression Manual, available from
policies.curtin.edu.au/findapolicy/
Pre-marking moderation
a co-assessor is assigned to this unit to review all assessment tasks and marking criteria/rubrics, and monitor and
confirm integrity of results. Assessment tasks are provided to students prior to the assessment task, marking
criteria are provided to students, assessors are provided with marking guides/rubric and sufficient information to
ensure fair and consistent evaluation of student work.
Intra-marking / Post-marking moderation
• Second marking of student work samples near grade boundaries
• Second marking of outlier samples
• Analysis of the variances between markers and locations, or analysis of item validity for eTests
• Second marking of a random sample to check for consistent application of marking criteria and standards
• Panel of academics discuss and collectively reach a consensus
Late assessment
Where the submission of a late assessment is permitted, late penalties will be consistently applied in this unit.
Where a late assessment is permitted for an assessment item or the entirety of the unit (refer to the Assessment
Schedule table in this Unit Outline) and the student does not have an approved assessment extension:
1.
2.
3.
For assessment items submitted within the first 24 hours after the due date/time, students will be penalised
by a deduction of 5% of the total marks allocated for the assessment task;
For each additional 24 hour period commenced an additional penalty of 10% of the total marks allocated
for the assessment item will be deducted; and
Assessment items submitted more than 168 hours late (7 calendar days) will receive a mark of zero.
Where late assessment is NOT permitted for an assessment item or the entirety of the unit (refer to the
Assessment Schedule table in this Unit Outline) and the student does not have an approved assessment extension:
1.
All assessment items submitted after the due date/time will receive a mark of zero.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 6 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Assessment extension
Where an application for an assessment extension is permitted for an assessment item(s) within this unit (refer to
the Assessment Schedule table in this Unit Outline):
1.
2.
3.
4.
A student who is unable to complete an assessment item by/on the due date/time as a result of exceptional
circumstances beyond the student’s control, may apply for an assessment extension on the Assessment
Extension Application Form as prescribed by the Academic Registrar. The form is available on the Forms
page at https://students.curtin.edu.au/essentials/forms-documents/forms/ and also within the student’s
OASIS (My Studies tab – Quick Forms) account.
The student will be expected to submit their application for an Assessment Extension with supporting
documentation via the online form.
Timely submission of this information supports the assessment process. For applications that are declined,
delayed submission may have significant ramifications on the possible marks awarded.
An application may be accepted up to five working days after the due date/time of the assessment item
where the student is able to provide a verifiable explanation as to why they were not able to submit the
application prior to the assessment due date/time
Where an application for an assessment extension is NOT permitted for an assessment item(s) within this unit
(refer to the Assessment Schedule table in this Unit Outline):
1.
All assessment items submitted after the due date/time will be subject to late penalties or receive a mark of
zero depending on the unit permitting late assessment submissions.
Deferred assessments
If your results show that you have been granted a deferred assessment you should immediately check OASIS for
details.
Deferred examinations/tests will be held from 15/07/2024 to 24/07/2024 . Notification to students will be made
after the Board of Examiners’ meeting via the Official Communications Channel (OCC) in OASIS.
Further assessment
Further assessments, if granted by the Board of Examiners, will be held between 15/07/2024 and 24/07/2024 .
Notification to students will be made after the Board of Examiners meeting via the Official Communications
Channel in OASIS.
It is the responsibility of the student to be available to complete the requirements of a further assessment. If your
results show that you have been granted a further assessment you should immediately check OASIS for details.
Reasonable adjustments for students with disabilities/health circumstances likely to impact on
studies
A Curtin Access Plan (CAP) is a document that outlines the type and level of support required by a student with a
disability or health condition to have equitable access to their studies at Curtin. Carers for people with disability
may also be eligible for support. This support can include alternative exam or test arrangements, study materials
in accessible formats, access to Curtin’s facilities and services or other support as discussed with an advisor from
AccessAbility Services.
Documentation is required from your treating Health Professional to confirm your health circumstances or carer
responsibilities.
If you think you may be eligible for a CAP, please contact AccessAbility Services. If you already have a CAP please
provide it to the Unit Coordinator in week 1 of each study period.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 7 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Referencing style
The referencing style for this unit is Chicago 17th Author-Date.
More information can be found on this style from the Library web site:
https://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/uniskills/referencing/chicago17.
Privacy
As part of a learning or assessment activity, or class participation, your image or voice may be recorded or
transmitted by equipment and systems operated by Curtin University. Transmission may be to other venues on
campus or to others both in Australia and overseas.
Your image or voice may also be recorded by students on personal equipment for individual or group study or
assessment purposes. Such recordings may not be reproduced or uploaded to a publicly accessible web
environment. If you wish to make such recordings for study purposes as a courtesy you should always seek the
permission of those who are impacted by the recording.
Recording of classes or course materials may not be exchanged or distributed for commercial purposes, for
compensation, or for any other purpose other than personal study for the enrolled students in the unit. Breach of
this may subject a student to disciplinary action under Statute No 10 – Student Disciplinary Statute.
If you wish to discuss this please talk to your Unit Coordinator.
Copyright
The course material for this unit is provided to you for your own research and study only. It is subject to
copyright. It is a copyright infringement to make this material available on third party websites without the express
written consent of Curtin University.
MGMT3006 Business Ethics
Singapore Campus
18 Feb 2024
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law
Page: 8 of 14
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
The only authoritative version of this Unit Outline is to be found online in OASIS
Faculty of Business and Law
School of Management and
Marketing
Academic Integrity (including plagiarism and cheating)
Academic Integrity
Curtin’s Student Charter, Academic Integrity Program (AIP), and core Values guide expectations regarding student
behaviour and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on the Academic Integrity Website.
Academic Integrity Warnings
An Academic Integrity Warning may be issued to a student in limited circumstances and only where misconduct is
not involved.
Academic Misconduct
Staff members are required to report poor academic practice and suspected misconduct. Academic Misconduct
means conduct by a student that is dishonest or unfair in connection with any academic work. This includes all
types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, falsification or fabrication of content, and behaviours like falsifying
medical certificates for extension. Contract cheating, the use of file sharing, translation services/apps,
paraphrasing tools (text-spinners), article generators, and assignment help websites also may be considered
academic misconduct.
Check your assessment instructions carefully before using any generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) software
(e.g. Chat GPT, Midjourney, GitHub Copilot, etc.). You are not permitted to use Gen-AI software in any assessment
task unless written permission is explicitly granted by the Unit Coordinator (e.g. within Blackboard or the
assignment specifications). If the use of Gen-AI software has been approved, you must document its use, apply
appropriate acknowledgement and attribution rules, and include a statement as to the nature and extent of the
use when submitting the assessment. Unapproved, inappropriate, or undisclosed use may be dishonest or unfair
behaviour, and thus considered misconduct. For further information on the use of Gen-AI software see the
Academic Integrity Website.
The longer term personal, social, and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask your
tutors or unit coordinator if you need clarification or are unsure what to do. If your work is the subject of an
inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work
under inquiry will not be graded until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct may include a warning,
a reduced or nil grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, an annulled grade (ANN) or termination from the
course. For more information refer to Statute No.10 Student D
