Description
Read the case “Selecting Mutual Funds for Retirement Accounts” attached below and then answer the following questions in detail. You work should be 5 full pages long (double-spaced) Case Questions1. How much money do you think Alice should put aside for her retirement account? 2.List the critical criteria Alice should consider in deciding which mutual fund(s) to invest in? 3.What do you think of set of Tier 2 and 3 funds available for her to invest in? Do you think the collection of funds in each asset class are good offerings? If not, what would you change? 4.What role, if any, did fees play in your determination of Alice’s portfolio? 5.If you were to pick only 2 funds, what would be those funds? And how would you combine them in her retirement portfolio? Try a few different combinations of the 2 selected funds and decide which one is the best. Note you need to be able to explain your decisions. Moreover, you need to make some assumptions based on the information that is provided in the case.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
KE1056
May 1, 2018
PHILLIP A. BRAUN
Selecting Mutual Funds for
Retirement Accounts (A)
Alice Monroe was a 30-year-old married mother of two who was an admissions ofcer at the
Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. She was just completing her frst year
of service at Northwestern and qualifed for the university’s 403(b) retirement plan. It was early
October 2017 and she had until the end of the month to decide if, to what extent, and how she
would participate in Northwestern’s retirement plan—that is, how much of her salary would she
put into the retirement plan, and into which mutual fund or funds would she allocate her savings?
Retirement Plans
Retirement plans are regulated under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 19741
and the Pension Protection Act of 2006,2 which set minimum standards for most private pension
plans to provide protection for individuals. Tese acts defne the necessary fduciary, reporting,
disclosure, minimum benefts, and minimum funding requirements for pension plans.
Defned contribution retirement plans are retirement plans in which an employee (often in
conjunction with their employer) contributes to a retirement savings account; upon retirement,
the employee can withdraw the accumulated funds—with any earnings from their investments—
from the account. Te retirement beneft is not fxed in advance; rather, it depends on the amount
contributed to the retirement account over time and how much the account has earned.
401(k) and 403(b) retirement plans are defned contribution retirement plans. Te names refer
to the sections of the IRS tax code that outline these plans. 401(k) plans started with the Revenue
©2018 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. Tis case was prepared by Professor Phillip
A. Braun. Cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not intended to serve as endorsements,
sources of primary data, or illustrations of efective or inefective management. Some details may have been fctionalized
for pedagogical purposes. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 800-545-7685 (or
617-783-7600 outside the United States or Canada) or e-mail [email protected]. No part of this publication
may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Kellogg Case Publishing.
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Act of 1978, which included a provision stating that employees would not be taxed on income they
elected to defer into retirement savings rather than receive as current income. Tis provision would
be incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code as Section 401(k), hence the name for this type of
savings plan. Te main distinction between 401(k) and 403(b) plans is the type of employers that
can ofer them: 401(k) plans are ofered by for-proft organizations and 403(b) plans by certain
non-proft organizations such as higher education institutions.3 Historically, 403(b) plans ofered
a more restricted set of investment options for participants than 401(k) plans, but more recently
403(b) plans had begun to ofer a broader range of options.
Under 401(k) and 403(b) plans, employees contribute a portion of their wages, often with a
matching contribution from their employers. Tese contributions are excluded from the employee’s
taxable income—taxes are not paid on this portion of the income until the money is withdrawn.
Any earnings on the retirement account, including dividends distributions, are also not taxable
until the money is withdrawn. In 2017, the maximum individual contribution per year that
could be made to 401(k) and 403(b) accounts for those under age 50 was $18,000; the limit was
$24,000 for those over age 50. Employers could ofer additional matching contributions up to a
total contribution maximum of $54,000 for those under age 50 and $60,000 for those over age
50.4 Tese maximums were expected to rise in the future to capture cost-of-living adjustments.
Employees could begin to withdraw funds from their 401(k) and 403(b) accounts at age 59½. If
they withdrew money earlier than this, they had to pay a 10% penalty plus taxes.5
Another option for retirement savings are defned beneft retirement plans. In these pension plans,
employers make predetermined monthly payments to a retired employee using a formula based on
that employee’s earnings history, tenure of service, and age. Te retirement beneft, therefore, is not
directly dependent on an individual’s own contribution to a retirement plan and the investment
returns on those contributions. Te employer bears the risk of meeting the retirement benefts
under defned beneft plans, whereas the worker bears the risk under defned contribution plans.
Historically, corporate and government retirement plans were predominantly defned beneft
plans. With the introduction of 401(k) plans in 1978, however, corporations gradually moved to
defned contribution plans. Government-sponsored retirement plans were much slower to make
the transition. Investments in defned contribution and beneft plans in the United States totaled
more than $15 trillion in 2016, with about $7 trillion in defned contribution plans, $3 trillion
in private defned beneft plans, and the remainder in public defned beneft plans.6 Assets in
private defned beneft plans fell from 80% of private retirement plan assets in 1975 to less than
40% in 2016.7
Mutual Funds
At the end of 2016, 55% of the money invested in defned contribution plans was invested
in mutual funds.8 Mutual funds are investment vehicles that pool investors’ money to purchase
a portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities. For the typical small investor, mutual funds are
a smart and cost-efective way to invest—with relatively little money an investor can purchase a
2
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
part of a large, professionally managed diversifed portfolio (most mutual funds hold hundreds of
securities) that can be easily bought and sold.
Mutual funds are regulated by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (40 Act),* together with
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Securities Act
of 1933. Te goal of the 40 Act was to give the public confdence in pooled investment companies,
such as mutual funds, by regulating their organization, disclosure, investment objectives, and
operations by providing transparency, liquidity, oversight, limits on leverage, and limits on how
managers can be remunerated in such investment companies.9
In 2016, mutual fund companies had almost $16.6 trillion in assets under management.
Households were the largest category of investors in those mutual funds; 44% of US households
owned mutual funds.10 Almost 22% of household assets were held in mutual funds, up from 2%
in 1980,11 with the median household having savings of $125,000 in mutual funds.12 Figure 1
shows the breakdown of mutual fund investments in 2016 by type of investment: equity, bond,
money market, or hybrid fund. Figure 2 shows the same breakdown for defned contribution plan
investments for 2016. Te main distinction is that defned contribution plans have a larger share
of investments in hybrid funds that include target retirement date funds.
Figure 1: Mutual Fund Investments by Type of Investment, 2016
Hybrid
%
Money Market
17%
Equity
53%
Bond
22%
Source: Investment Company Institute, “2017 Investment Company Fact Book,” p. 28.
* Te 40 Act refers to the 1940 Act itself, subsequent amendments (1970), and rules issued by the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Act.
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
3
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Figure 2: Defined Contribution Investments by Type of Investment, 2016
Hybrid
26%
Money Market
3%
Equity
60%
Bond
11%
Source: Investment Company Institute, “2017 Investment Company Fact Book,” p. 159.
Tere are two main classes of mutual funds, actively managed funds and passively managed
funds. Passively managed funds are also called index funds because they are often simply passively
mimicking a common index such as the S&P 500 Index or the Dow Jones Index. In contrast,
actively managed funds attempt to beat an underlying index. Of the $16.6 trillion that the mutual
fund industry had under management in 2016, 15% was in index funds.13 More specifcally, 25%
of all equity mutual fund assets in 2016 were passively managed, up from 10% in 2001.14
Mutual funds have two types of expenses that they pass on to investors: expense ratios and sales
loads. Annual expenses, including administration costs, are paid by investors indirectly and are
included in the expense ratio. Sales loads are typically paid at the time a fund is purchased (frontend loads) and are compensation for a fnancial advisor. Figure 3 shows the expense ratios in 2000
and 2016 for equity, bond, and hybrid funds. For all three types of funds, expense ratios had fallen
dramatically. Likewise, the average sales load fees that investors paid over this period declined; the
average sales load fee that investors paid in 2016 was less than 1%, a decline from around 1.4% in
2000.15 Most mutual funds invested in via 401(k) and 403(b) plans are no-load low-cost mutual
funds—for example, equity mutual funds invested in through 401(k) accounts had an average
expense ratio in 2016 of only 0.53% compared to an expense ratio of 0.67% for equity mutual
funds industry-wide.16
4
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Figure 3: Average Asset-Weighted Expense Ratio by Type of Fund
1.0%
Expense Ratio
0.8%
0.6%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
Equity
Bond
2000
Hybrid
2016
Source: Investment Company Institute, “2017 Investment Company Fact Book,” p. 89.
Looking deeper into the expense ratios, Figure 4 compares the expense ratios of active equity
and bond funds with index equity and bond funds in 2016. Te expense ratios for index funds are
at least 1/6 below those of active funds. Figure 5 presents the expense ratios for equity funds by
how the fund is managed. Equity blend funds have the lowest expense ratio, and world funds have
the highest.
Figure 4: Average Asset-Weighted Expense Ratios for Active vs. Index Funds, 2016
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
Expense Ratio
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
Equity
Bond
Active
Index
Source: Investment Company Institute, “2017 Investment Company Fact Book,” p. 96.
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
5
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Figure 5: Average Asset-Weighted Expense Ratios for Equity Funds by Management
Style, 2016
0.8%
0.7%
Expense Ratio
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
Growth
Sector
Value
Blend
World
Source: Investment Company Institute, “2017 Investment Company Fact Book,” p. 93.
Northwestern’s Retirement Plan
An employee was eligible for Northwestern’s retirement plan if he or she was at least 24
years old and had at least one year of continuous service at Northwestern or the equivalent at
another tax-exempt educational or research organization where he or she was eligible to accrue
retirement benefts.
Once employees became eligible for the retirement plan, Northwestern automatically made
contributions to their retirement plan equal to 5% of their eligible earnings every pay period. For
the most part, “eligible earnings” meant an employee’s base salary. Employees could also make
voluntary additional contributions to their retirement plans that were matched by the university.
If an employee made a voluntary contribution of at least 1% of his or her eligible earnings (but
not exceeding 5%), the university made a matched retirement contribution equal to 100% of
the employee’s contribution. Finally, employees could make voluntary supplemental retirement
contributions* (contributions in excess of 5% of their eligible earnings) up to the federally mandated
limit.† Northwestern did not match these voluntary supplemental retirement contributions. All
contributions to an employee’s retirement plan below the federally mandated limit were made on
a before-tax basis.17
* Northwestern employees were able to make supplemental contributions to their retirement plan prior to becoming
eligible to participate in the retirement plan. Furthermore, if they ceased to be eligible to participate in the
retirement plan, they could continue to make contributions.
†
As noted earlier in the case, the annual limit was $18,000 for those under 50 and $24,000 for those over 50.
6
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Northwestern’s 403(b) retirement plan was managed by Fidelity Investments.* Fidelity was
the fourth-largest mutual fund and fnancial services company in the world in 2016, ofering more
than 10,000 mutual funds to its customers with more than $2 trillion in assets under management.
As the overall manager of Northwestern’s 403(b) plan, Fidelity received a management fee from the
assets under management in the plan.
In the summer of 2016, Northwestern introduced a new investment structure for its
retirement plans. A committee of Northwestern faculty and administrators (the Northwestern
University Retirement Investment Committee) put together a list of 24 core funds among which
Northwestern employees could allocate their retirement savings, including a selection of US equity
and bond funds and international equity funds. Tese were not just Fidelity funds, but also funds
managed by Goldman Sachs, Vanguard, Met Life, and others. Tese 24 core funds were split across
a three-tier investment structure that provided employees fexibility to choose investments based
on their investment style and preference. In addition, a fourth tier provided access to many more
funds, but these were not evaluated by the investment committee.
•
Te Tier 1 investments were target retirement date mutual funds. A target date fund is a
mixture of stocks and bonds, both US and international, in which the percentage of stocks
versus bonds varies depending on the investor’s age. Te younger a person is, the higher
the percentage of stocks in the fund. As the person’s target retirement date becomes closer,
the fund manager adjusts the asset allocation mix to make it more conservative. Target date
funds are a good investment choice for someone seeking a diversifed mix of stocks, bonds,
and short-term investments in one investment option or who does not feel comfortable
making asset allocation choices over time. Te list of Northwestern’s nine available target
retirement date funds and their fees is presented in Exhibit 1.
•
Tier 2 investments were passively managed (index) mutual funds. Te list of four available
Tier 2 core mutual funds and their strategies is presented in Exhibit 2.
•
Tier 3 investments were actively managed mutual funds. Te list of 11 Tier 3 core mutual
funds and their strategies is presented in Exhibit 3.
•
Tier 4 was an expanded set of mutual funds that were accessed directly from the plan
sponsor. Tier 4 provided Northwestern employees with access to thousands of mutual funds
from hundreds of mutual fund companies. Te university neither evaluated nor monitored
these investments. It was the employee’s responsibility to ensure that the investments
they selected were suitable for their situation, including their goals, time horizon,
and risk tolerance.
Morningstar Database
To help herself select the funds to invest in, Alice purchased access to the Morningstar mutual
fund database. Morningstar, a Chicago-based investment research frm founded in 1984 by Joe
* Northwestern also had a second retirement plan sponsor, TIAA-CREF, but to simplify this case only Fidelity
is considered.
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
7
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
Mansueto, launched its mutual fund database in 1986. Te frm provided information on some
525,000 investment oferings around the world, including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and
exchange-traded funds. Te company also ofered investment management services.
Using the Morningstar database, Alice could look up the historical performance of a fund,
its fees, the assets under management, the Morningstar Rating™, the capital asset pricing model’s
alpha and beta, fund management, main holdings, the Morningstar Category™ or management
style, an analyst report (if the fund was followed by a Morningstar analyst), and much more.
Te Morningstar data for Northwestern’s Tier 2 and 3 funds is presented in Exhibit 4 and the
defnitions for the Morningstar Categories in Exhibit 5.
Te Morningstar Rating for funds, also called the star rating, was a proprietary mutual fund
risk- and cost-adjusted performance scale of one to fve (fve being the best). Investors could
evaluate a fund’s past performance within Morningstar’s Categories or mutual fund style classes
such as large cap growth fund or intermediate bond fund. Te ratings took into account all sales
charges, loads, and other fees, as well as the historical risk of a fund. Te Morningstar Rating was
intended as a frst step in the mutual fund evaluation process for investors. A high rating was not
a sufcient basis for investment decisions, although it enabled investors to distinguish among
funds that used similar investment strategies. Morningstar’s rating system was based on expected
utility theory—the idea that investors care more about poor outcomes than good outcomes and
are willing to give up some portion of their expected return in exchange for greater certainty of
expected return. Te rating accounted for all variations in a fund’s monthly returns but with more
emphasis on downward variations. Only 10% of funds within an investment category were rated
fve-star, 22.5% four-star, 35% three-star, 22.5% two-star, and 10% one-star.
Data Analytics
While the Morningstar database provided a lot of useful information, it was lacking in
certain areas. Due to their proprietary nature, Morningstar Ratings were rather opaque, and it
was not clear how the ratings incorporated risk and fees into their rankings. Furthermore, the
ratings compared funds within a Morningstar Category, but would not help compare funds across
Morningstar Categories.
Alice recalled learning about the Sharpe ratio—a risk-return trade-of measure developed by
William Sharpe, one of the 1990 Noble laureates in economics—in an investments course at
college. Mathematically the Sharpe ratio is expressed as:
ℎ =
− –
Te average return and standard deviation are calculated using a fund’s historical returns and the
risk-free return is typically the return on a one-month Treasury bill.
8
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
KE1056
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
Alice remembered that the Sharpe ratio was used to compare the risk-return trade-of between
well-diversifed portfolios; the portfolio with the higher Sharpe ratio yields the better return per
unit of risk. Terefore, she felt the Sharpe ratio could be a useful metric in selecting the optimal
mix of mutual funds.
Alice also recalled from her class the role of the correlation coefcient in measuring the
diversifcation possibilities between two portfolios, though she was not quite sure how to use the
correlation coefcient to help her in her fund selections. She recalled that the correlation coefcient
is bounded between 1 and -1. If two portfolios move in perfect sync with each other (i.e., both
rising or falling together), then they are perfectly positively correlated and have a correlation
coefcient of 1. If two portfolios move in opposite directions (i.e., one rises while the other falls),
they are perfectly negatively correlated and have a correlation coefcient of -1. If two portfolios
move independently of each other, then they have a correlation coefcient of 0. Portfolios with a
high positive correlation, such as 0.9, are very similar and do not ofer much diversifcation. As the
correlation between two portfolios moves from 1 to -1, the better the diversifcation possibilities.
Alice collected as much historical data as she could for each of the funds. Unfortunately,
because some of the funds were fairly new oferings, she could collect only 99 months of consistent
historical data across the funds. Furthermore, there was no return data available for the Blackrock
life cycle funds. Te return data she did collect were net of all fees. Tis return data are presented
in Exhibit 6.* From the Wall Street Journal, Alice learned that the current one-month Treasury bill
rate was approximately 1% on an annualized basis.
Conclusion
Alice’s goal in saving for retirement was to ensure that she individually would have enough
to live on after she retired at the age of 65. She was not sure how much of her $75,000 annual
salary she should save toward retirement. Her husband earned $80,000 per year and together they
wanted to concentrate on saving for a new car and a down payment for a house. All of their other
major fnancial decisions, such as a college savings plan, healthcare, and monthly expenses, were
adequately planned for.
In general, she felt that saving for retirement was a low priority for her right now—retirement
seemed far enough down the road that she could worry about it later. She found the additional 5%
matching by Northwestern enticing, but she was not sure she wanted to set aside that much toward
her retirement at this point, especially since her husband already had a 401(k) account at his job.
Should she just not save for retirement right now?
* To get the longest historical record for each mutual fund, it was necessary to use diferent share classes across time
for some mutual funds. For example, the historical record for one of Northwestern’s funds, the American Funds
New World Fund Class R-6, was taken from a diferent class of the fund, its Institutional Class, because the R-6
did not have a complete historical record. Note that although the two funds held the same investments, they did
not have the same returns because they had diferent fee structures.
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
9
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
KE1056
If she did start investing, she was not sure how to pick the funds for her retirement account.
Although there were only 15 Tier 2 and 3 funds, there were thousands more if she considered
Tier 4 funds. Furthermore, although the information from Morningstar was interesting and
the statistics she calculated insightful, they did not give her the absolute clarity she hoped for.
In general, she felt somewhat overwhelmed by the whole prospect of selecting funds for her
retirement account. Should she just go with the target-date retirement fund?
10
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
KE1056
M U T UA L F U N D S F O R R E T I R E M E N T A C C O U N T S ( A )
Exhibit 1: Tier 1 Target Retirement Date Core Mutual Funds
Tese investment funds seek to provide for retirement outcomes based on quantitatively
measured risk. Tey allocate assets among a combination of equity and bond index funds and
money market funds in proportions based on their specifc comprehensive investment strategy.
Te Retirement Fund is designed for those already in retirement, and the funds with a year in
their name are for those expecting to retire around the year indicated. Te funds are managed to
gradually become more conservative as they approach their target date. Te investment risk of each
target date fund changes over time as its asset allocation changes.
Tese funds are intended for someone seeking an investment option that gradually becomes
more conservative over time and who is willing to accept the volatility of the markets, as well as
someone who is seeking a diversifed mix of stocks, bonds, and short-term investments in one
investment option or who does not feel comfortable making asset allocation choices over time.
Fund Name
Ticker
Expense Ratio
BlackRock LifePath® Index Retirement Fund Class K Shares
LIRKX
0.18%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2020 Fund Class K Shares
LIMKX
0.17%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2025 Fund Class K Shares
LIBKX
0.18%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2030 Fund Class K Shares
LINKX
0.18%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2035 Fund Class K Shares
LIJKX
0.19%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2040 Fund Class K Shares
LIKKX
0.20%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2045 Fund Class K Shares
LIHKX
0.23%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2050 Fund Class K Shares
LIPKX
0.23%
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2055 Fund Class K Shares
LIVKX
0.31%
Source: Northwestern 403(b) Retirement Plans Investment Options Guide, 2017.
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
11
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
VBTIX
VTSNX
Vanguard Total
Bond Market Index
Fund Institutional
Shares
Vanguard Total
International
Stock Index Fund
Institutional Shares
This document is authorized for use only by hamed alblooshi in FIN-315-SP24 taught by Saeid Hoseinzade, Suffolk University from Mar 2024 to May 2024.
Kellogg School of Management
Source: Northwestern 403(b) Retirement Plans Investment Options Guide, 2016.
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track
the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, a floatadjusted market-capitalization-weighted index designed to measure
equity market performance of companies located in developed and
emerging markets, excluding the United States. The index includes
approximately 5,715 stocks of companies located in 45 countries.
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to
track the performance of the Barclays US Aggregate Float Adjusted
Index. This index represents a wide spectrum of public, investmentgrade, taxable, fixed-income securities in the United States, including
government, corporate, and international dollar-denominated bonds,
as well as mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, all with
maturities of more than one year. All of the fund’s investments will
be selected through the sampling process, and at least 80% of the
fund’s assets will be invested in bonds held in the index.
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to
track the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, a widely
recognized benchmark of US stock market performance that is
dominated by the stocks of large US companies. The advisor attempts
to replicate the target index by investing all, or substantially all, of
its assets in the stocks that make up the index, holding each stock in
approximately the same proportion as its weighting
in the index.
VINIX
Vanguard
Institutional Index
Fund Institutional
Shares
Strategy
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track
the performance of the S&P Completion Index, a broadly diversified
index of stocks of small and mid-size US companies. It invests by
sampling the index, meaning that it holds a collection of securities
that, in the aggregate, approximates the full index in terms of key
characteristics. These characteristics include industry weightings and
market capitalization, as well as certain financial measures such as
price/earnings ratio and dividend yield.
Ticker
Vanguard Extended VIEIX
Market Index Fund
Institutional Shares
Fund Name
KE1056
Someone who is seeking to complement a portfolio of
domestic investments with international investments
(which can behave differently), and who is willing
to accept the higher degree of risk associated with
investing overseas.
12
Someone who is seeking potential returns primarily in
the form of interest dividends rather than through an
increase in share price, and who is seeking to diversify
an equity portfolio with a more conservative investment
option.
Someone who is seeking the potential for long-term
share-price appreciation and dividend income, who is
seeking both growth- and value-style investments, and
who is willing to accept the volatility associated with
investing in the stock market.
Someone who is seeking the potential for long-term
share-price appreciation and dividend income, who is
seeking both growth- and value-style investments, and
who is willing to accept the generally greater volatility of
investments in smaller companies.
Who May Want to Invest
Exhibit 2: Tier 2 Passive Core Mutual Funds, Strategies and Objectives
M u t ua l F u n d s f o r R e t i r e m e n t A c c o u n t s ( A )
For the exclusive use of h. alblooshi, 2024.
RNWGX
GSSUX
JDVWX
MVCKX
MEFZX
MWTSX
VPMAX
WSCRX
FDIKX
PFPRX
PIREX
American Funds New
World Fund Class R-6
Goldman Sachs Small Cap
Value Class R6
John Hancock Funds
Disciplined Value Fund
Class R6
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
Class R5
MassMutual Select Mid
Cap Growth Equity Fund
II Class I
Metropolitan West Total
Return Bond Fund Plan
Class
Vanguard PRIMECAP
Fund Admiral Shares
Wells Fargo Small
Company Growth Fund
Class R6
Fidelity Diversified
International Fund Class K
Parnassus Fund
Institutional Shares
Principal Real Estate
Securities Fund
Institutional Class
The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies principally
engaged in the real estate industry at the time of each purchase. It is non-diversified.
The fund invests in undervalued stocks. It follows a contrarian strategy of seeking to invest in
stocks that are currently out of favor with the financial community and are therefore deeply
undervalued. It is a “multi-cap” fund in that it can invest in companies of any size, from larger,
well-established companies to smaller companies with market capitalizations below $1 billion.
Normally invests primarily in common stocks of non-US securities.
The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of small-capitalization
companies. Small-capitalization companies are defined as companies with market
capitalizations within the range of the Russell 2000® Index at the time of purchase.
The fund invests in stocks considered to have above-average earnings growth potential that is
not reflected in their current market prices. Its portfolio consists predominantly of large- and
mid-capitalization stocks.
The fund pursues its objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net
assets in investment-grade fixed-income securities or unrated securities that are determined
to be of similar quality. Up to 2
