Description
Study Barney’s (1991) article Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage(new tab).In particular, look for the line of logical flow. Consider how Barney (1991) supports his arguments.Write a short paper, 500-700 words in length, analyzing Barney’s (1991) article. In your essay, respond to the following questions:Which of the six social science paradigms given above seem to underly Barney’s (1991) approach?How did Barney (1991) justify his methodological approach and support his conclusions?Why do you think this article has been cited so many times? What makes it “good” research?Your paper should be properly formatted per APA guidelines. Robustly support your points with appropriate sources. Cite these sources and provide a correctly formatted reference list.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
1.4/2.3 Assignment (40 points)
Course: 3WI2024 Found of Doctoral Research (BADM-702-01B)
Criteria
Quality of
Content
Excellent
Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
25 points
22 points
20 points
17 points
/ 25
(23-25 points)
(21-22 points)
(18-20 points)
(0-17 points)
Thoroughly
addresses the
prompt(s).
Adequately
addresses the
prompt(s).
Clearly
demonstrates
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
Demonstrates
a basic
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
Partially
addresses the
prompt(s) or
addresses only
some of the
prompts.
Minimally
addresses or
does not
address the
prompt(s).
citations and
references).
citations and
references).
Provides clear
evidence of
critical
thinking.
Provides some
evidence of
critical
thinking.
Demonstrates
a limited
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
citations and
references).
Provides
limited
evidence of
critical
thinking.
Does not
adequately
demonstrate
an
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts or
provide
evidence of
critical
thinking.
Criteria
Written
Communicati
on and
Organization
Excellent
Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
15 points
14 points
11 points
8 points
/ 15
Written
communication
is easy to read
and
understand.
(12-14 points)
(9-11 points)
(0-8 points)
No
communication
or written
communication
is not as clear
due to many
issues with the
effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
Appropriately
Written
Written
communication communication
is readable.
is not as clear
due to a few
Communicates issues with the
clearly through effective
the control of
control of
grammar and
grammar and
spelling, with
spelling.
only minimal
errors.
Attempts to
use APA for
uses APA for
citations and
Appropriately
uses APA for
citations and
references, but
No attempt to
use APA
references.
citations and
references.
errors are
present.
appropriately.
Communicates
clearly through
the effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
Paper is
carefully and
logically
organized.
Paper is
organized
logically and
Paper has
organizational
issues that
Paper is poorly
organized and
key points are
difficult to
Key points are
key points are
supported and
make it
difficult to
follow or not
supported.
clear and
easy to follow.
robustly
supported with
high-quality
sources.
Total
follow the key
points, which
are not well
supported.
/ 40
Overall Score
Excellent
Competent
Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Failing
37 points minimum
33 points minimum
29 points minimum
0 points minimum
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
