Description
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Review “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website, both located in the topic Resources. In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, discuss the influence “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health” and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.
Include the following:
Describe the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
Explain the trend occurring in the nursing workforce and how nursing education is adapting to meet the evolving needs of the profession. What is the role of the nurse in leading change?
Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the National Academy of Sciences report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Topic 1 Participation
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Collapse All
Future of Nursing Report – Rubric
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and Future
of Nursing Report
Criteria Description
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report.
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is omitted or inaccurate.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
16.5 points
Current Trends and Education
16.5 points
Criteria Description
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce and how nursing education
is adapting to meet the needs.
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how
nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in
leading change of the profession is discussed.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing
education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading
change is discussed.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is
adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is
discussed.
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is
adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change lacks detail
or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is
adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is omitted
or inaccurate.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form
National Academy of Sciences re
Criteria Description
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the
goals in the National Academy of Sciences report.
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how
they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is
presented.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help
advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance
the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how these advance the
goals in the National Academy of Sciences report lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted or inaccurate.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
16.5 points
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
33 points
Criteria Description
A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they
advance the nursing profession.
5. Target
33 points
A clear and accurate discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action
coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.
4. Acceptable
29.37 points
A detailed discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and
how they advance the nursing profession is present.
3. Approaching
26.07 points
A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they
advance the nursing profession is present.
2. Insufficient
24.75 points
A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they
advance the nursing profession lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they
advance the nursing profession is omitted or inaccurate.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Barriers to Advancement
33 points
Criteria Description
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how
nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers.
5. Target
33 points
A clear and accurate description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in
the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
4. Acceptable
29.37 points
A detailed description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state
and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
3. Approaching
26.07 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how
nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
2. Insufficient
24.75 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how
nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how
nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted or inaccurate.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
11.55 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target
11.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable
10.28 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Approaching
9.12 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient
8.66 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little
awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate
audience is evident.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
11.55 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target
11.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable
10.28 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Approaching
9.12 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient
8.66 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence
9.9 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target
9.9 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are
clearly considered.
4. Acceptable
8.81 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching
7.82 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient
7.43 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of the writer.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing
9.9 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target
9.9 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
8.81 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching
7.82 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
7.43 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation
6.6 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
6.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
5.87 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
5.21 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient
4.95 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 165 points
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
