Description
Essay 4: Research Essay
College Writing 1
20% of Grade
CONTEXT
Over the course of this semester, you have learned about the single story, intersectionality, and the cultural competency continuum. You have read The House on Mango Street and wrote a Literary Analysis essay and started a multiple-essay writing project revolving around a social issue that affects a community you are a part of. Then, while reading Minor Feelings, you started a larger writing project with an Anecdotal Essay in which you told a story and showed how it represents a larger social issue that affects your community. You then revised your anecdote and added research, forming a persuasive argument in favor of social change. You should have an essay that establishes your ethos, pathos, and logos. Now, we are going to wrap everything up and create a Research Essay.
THE PROMPT
For Essay #4, you are going to edit and elaborate on your Persuasive Essay by proposing a way to remedy your social issue. I use “remedy” instead of “solve” because these are all such large scale issues. They are too nuanced to simply “solve.” Your remedy should have steps that show that it is achievable. You will also include what you believe the outcome of your remedy will be. You will include at least three more scholarly sources. You must have one counter argument and refutation, so one of those two sources will counter your own. By thoughtfully addressing a legitimate source that counters your own argument, you further strengthen your credibility.
The Research Essay should add about 1,000 – 1,300 to your total project. Since the Persuasive Essay should be 3,000 – 3,600 words, your total should be 4,000 – 4,900 words.
For this essay, you will use at least three more reliable sources for a total of at least six reliable secondary sources that discuss your chosen social issue or provide evidence to assist your argument. One of them must be a counterargument that you will refute. Four of the six sources must be scholarly. Sources that can be helpful but are NOT scholarly include government websites and news sources. Remember that academic, reliable, and relevant sources will be:
Scholarly
Peer reviewed
Written in the last five years, or written between 2018 and now (there are some exceptions to this rule, so if you find an older source that you want to use please reach out to me)
If you already used one of our class texts for your essay, you cannot use another one for the Research Essay. You can use one of our following class texts towards your required six sources, but any more you use will not count towards your required six sources.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “The Danger of a Single Story”
Kimberlé Crenshaw’s “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color”
Deandra Little, David A. Green, Peter Felten’s “Identity, Intersectionality, and Educational Development”
STEPS TO TAKE TO COMPLETION
Go to the Essay #3 submission portal and read through the comments on your final draft of Essay #3. Apply those corrections.
Think about a remedy that you believe will help solve your chosen social issue using the IVC Library Database. Read up on your topic and annotate the texts you find. Learn about what is already being done. Specifically make note of parts of the texts that will work well in your essay.
Make an outline of the finished product, one that combines the Anecdotal Essay, Persuasive Essay, and the Research Essay.
Write the Research Essay, giving the reader the steps on how to implement your remedy and the outcome you hope will happen.
You won’t need the conclusion to Essay #3 anymore, so either delete it or edit it to fit the needs of concluding the Research Essay.
GUIDELINES
3,000 – 3,600 words from Essay #3 + 1,000 – 1,300 words from Essay #4 = 4,000 – 4,900 words
MLA Format
12 pt. Font, Times New Roman, double spaced, 1 inch margins, etc.
At least six sources (total)
Four must be scholarly sources
Two can be reliable sources from the news, government, etc.
One of the sources can be one of our class texts
Works Cited Page
Creative and relevant title
The essay should mostly be in third-person point of view except for your anecdote and when you refer to your anecdote.
DUE DATE
Research Essay due 12/20
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Essay 4: Research Essay
College Writing 1
20% of Grade
CONTEXT
Over the course of this semester, you have learned about the single story,
intersectionality, and the cultural competency continuum. You have read The House on
Mango Street and wrote a Literary Analysis essay and started a multiple-essay writing
project revolving around a social issue that affects a community you are a part of. Then,
while reading Minor Feelings, you started a larger writing project with an Anecdotal
Essay in which you told a story and showed how it represents a larger social issue that
affects your community. You then revised your anecdote and added research, forming a
persuasive argument in favor of social change. You should have an essay that establishes
your ethos, pathos, and logos. Now, we are going to wrap everything up and create a
Research Essay.
THE PROMPT
For Essay #4, you are going to edit and elaborate on your Persuasive Essay by proposing a
way to remedy your social issue. I use “remedy” instead of “solve” because these are all
such large scale issues. They are too nuanced to simply “solve.” Your remedy should have
steps that show that it is achievable. You will also include what you believe the outcome
of your remedy will be. You will include at least three more scholarly sources. You must
have one counter argument and refutation, so one of those two sources will counter your
own. By thoughtfully addressing a legitimate source that counters your own argument,
you further strengthen your credibility.
The Research Essay should add about 1,000 – 1,300 to your total project. Since the
Persuasive Essay should be 3,000 – 3,600 words, your total should be 4,000 – 4,900 words.
For this essay, you will use at least three more reliable sources for a total of at least six
reliable secondary sources that discuss your chosen social issue or provide evidence to
assist your argument. One of them must be a counterargument that you will refute. Four
of the six sources must be scholarly. Sources that can be helpful but are NOT scholarly
1
include government websites and news sources. Remember that academic, reliable, and
relevant sources will be:
●
Scholarly
●
Peer reviewed
●
Written in the last five years, or written between 2018 and now (there are some
exceptions to this rule, so if you find an older source that you want to use please
reach out to me)
If you already used one of our class texts for your essay, you cannot use another one for
the Research Essay. You can use one of our following class texts towards your required
six sources, but any more you use will not count towards your required six sources.
●
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “The Danger of a Single Story”
●
Kimberlé Crenshaw’s “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics,
and Violence against Women of Color”
Deandra Little, David A. Green, Peter Felten’s “Identity, Intersectionality, and
Educational Development”
●
STEPS TO TAKE TO COMPLETION
1. Go to the Essay #3 submission portal and read through the comments on your
final draft of Essay #3. Apply those corrections.
2. Think about a remedy that you believe will help solve your chosen social issue
using the IVC Library Database. Read up on your topic and annotate the texts you
find. Learn about what is already being done. Specifically make note of parts of
the texts that will work well in your essay.
3. Make an outline of the finished product, one that combines the Anecdotal Essay,
Persuasive Essay, and the Research Essay.
4. Write the Research Essay, giving the reader the steps on how to implement your
remedy and the outcome you hope will happen.
5. You won’t need the conclusion to Essay #3 anymore, so either delete it or edit it to
fit the needs of concluding the Research Essay.
GUIDELINES
1. 3,000 – 3,600 words from Essay #3 + 1,000 – 1,300 words from Essay #4 = 4,000 4,900 words
2. MLA Format
2
a. 12 pt. Font, Times New Roman, double spaced, 1 inch margins, etc.
3. At least six sources (total)
a. Four must be scholarly sources
b. Two can be reliable sources from the news, government, etc.
c. One of the sources can be one of our class texts
4. Works Cited Page
5. Creative and relevant title
6. The essay should mostly be in third-person point of view except for your anecdote
and when you refer to your anecdote.
DUE DATES
3
●
Prewriting due 12/8
●
Research Essay due 12/20
Yuetong 1
Name: Yuetong Qi
Class: wr1
Professor: Bethany Pelonis
Date: 12-1-2023
Introduction
The need to address objectification
The human brain has an innate tendency to focus on and, in certain situations, be more
sensitive to negative stimuli. This tendency, sometimes called the “negativity bias,” has
evolutionary origins and is evident in several cognitive functions. Consequently, objectification,
harassment, and bullying are examples of negative aspects of traumatic experiences that the
human brain is predisposed to focus on and remember. Over time, this affects how someone
perceives themselves and their relationships with others. This essay is based on my personal
experience with online objectification. Through critically examining the dark side and
implications of objectification, this essay aims to educate on the importance of taking action
before it is too late.
Unmasking the Enablers of Objectification
The intersectional analysis employed unveils a complex web of cultural constraints that
intricately dictate individual freedoms, creating a clash between authentic gender expression and
stifling societal norms. Within this intricate tapestry, the patriarchal structure emerges as a
formidable force perpetuating the ceaseless scrutiny of women’s bodies. This dominance is
upheld by a prescribed script dictating not just appearance but also behavior, confining women
Yuetong 2
within narrow confines (Schwartz pg.25). My personal experiences become a potent lens to
scrutinize the broader cultural narrative resonating with countless individuals grappling with the
insidious effects of objectification. Valente’s exploration of societal pathology reinforces the
urgent imperative for change, shedding light on the societal sickness that tolerates and
perpetuates the objectification of women (Valente, pg.7). As cautioned by Adichie, the reduction
of multifaceted individuals to simplistic, one-dimensional stories fuels negative stereotypes. It
significantly contributes to the unrelenting objectification faced by women. The call to action is
clear: a transformative shift is necessary but imperative to dismantle these entrenched cultural
norms and pave the way for a society that values the richness of individual narratives over
limiting and dehumanizing stereotypes.
Understanding the root of objectification
Objectification, as illuminated by psychological insights, encompasses the deliberate
reduction of an individual to a mere sexual object devoid of autonomy and emotional depth. This
phenomenon is particularly pronounced online, where anonymity provides a shield of perceived
impunity. The motivations driving individuals to objectify others are multifaceted rooted in
complex psychological and societal dynamics. One prominent driver is the desire to evade the
discomfort associated with empathy and the consequential feelings of guilt or shame that may
arise from harming or exploiting others. Objectification becomes a defense mechanism against
acknowledging the humanity and vulnerability of the targeted individual. (Coghlan et al., pg.17)
Additionally, it functions as a coping mechanism for those grappling with personal fears,
longings, vulnerabilities, and unmet needs for intimacy. Individuals shield themselves from
confronting their insecurities by projecting these internal struggles onto others and treating them
solely as instruments for personal gratification. Moreover, objectification serves as a tool for
Yuetong 3
asserting power and dominance, especially over those belonging to different or marginalized
groups. It becomes a means of reinforcing societal hierarchies and establishing a false sense of
superiority. Societal norms perpetuated by media and entertainment industries further contribute
to objectification, as individuals conform to perceived standards of desirability and acceptability.
In essence, the roots of objectification intertwine with intricate psychological motivations and
societal expectations, necessitating a comprehensive approach to dismantling this pervasive
issue. Recognizing these drivers is pivotal in fostering empathy, respect, and equality in online
and offline realms, steering society toward a collective rejection of objectification.
The dangers of objectification
My personal experience with objectification left a very bad taste behind. I stand as a
living testament to the swift transformation from what initially seemed innocent to an alarming
and distressing situation in seconds. The repercussions of objectification manifest not only in
personal distress but extend to a societal scale. In August 2022, Shah Alam, a TikTok creator and
mother of three, succumbed to the devastating effects of cyberbullying rooted in appearancerelated criticisms, including disparagement over her choice of handbags (Selvam, pg 1). This
tragic incident serves as an illustration of the profound mental impact caused by objectification,
highlighting its enduring consequences. The distressing reality is that what begins as seemingly
harmless online interactions can escalate into a crisis with severe implications for an individual’s
mental well-being. It is an urgent reminder of the critical need for heightened awareness,
empathy, and societal change to combat the destructive influence of objectification and
cyberbullying.
Cultural attitudes that support objectification
Yuetong 4
I faced a lot of backlash, both virtually and physically, because of my seemingly innocent
post. I could do nothing at that moment except wish to disappear into thin air like Alladin’s
magic spell. However, given that I live in the real world and not a movie, my situation intensified
with each click, and the internet’s algorithm played a significant role. However, looking back at
that moment, the cultural attitudes that fueled the online and offline backlash. I experienced were
deeply rooted in societal norms that perpetuated objectification. At that moment, the virtual and
physical onslaught reflected the prevalence of cultural standards that undermine individual
agency and perpetuate gender-based judgments. The reaction to my innocent post highlighted a
collective adherence to antiquated notions of how women should express themselves,
emphasizing appearance over autonomy (Coghlan et al., pg.17). The objectification I faced
underscored a societal inclination to reduce individuals, particularly women, to one-dimensional
symbols, reinforcing harmful stereotypes. This cultural tendency is sustained by the digital age’s
amplification of opinions through algorithms and internet algorithms that prioritize
sensationalism and reinforce existing biases. The combination of historical expectations imposed
on women and the digital era’s amplification mechanisms created a perfect storm, intensifying
the objectification I experienced. Therefore, understanding and challenging these cultural
attitudes is essential for dismantling the pervasive issue of objectification and fostering a society
that respects individual agency and diversity.
Call to action
I found myself in profound helplessness, besieged by relentless objectification with no
refuge in sight. It resembled a judgment day where condemnation rained down upon me. The
biblical narratives of women facing stoning for perceived sins resonated uncomfortably, except
here, demeaning comments and harassment tore me apart. Private messages inundated me, and
Yuetong 5
anonymous calls from strangers became a distressing norm. I grappled with the bewildering
realization that my seemingly innocent post had triggered such an intense and unwarranted
outburst of harassment. What struck me most was the unexpected betrayal from other women in
the comments. Those I anticipated would offer solidarity instead cast me out, accusing me of
indecency and placing blame squarely on my shoulders. The heartbreak was palpable, and amid
this ordeal, I yearned for someone to see beyond the objectification to appreciate me for who I
am.
The experience left me feeling tainted and exposed, a sentiment that lingered long after
the incident. Therefore, this raises the need to address the online objectification of women.
Objectification perpetuates a harmful culture that inflicts emotional wounds. The enduring
impact of this experience emphasizes the urgency to address online objectification, particularly
concerning women. Normalizing such behavior not only fosters an environment where
individuals are reduced to mere objects but also perpetuates a cycle of emotional distress and
societal disregard for personal boundaries (Coghlan et al., pg.18). It underscores the imperative
for collective efforts to challenge and reshape cultural attitudes, fostering a digital space where
individuals, irrespective of gender, can express themselves without fear of dehumanization or
judgment. We can strive towards a more respectful and inclusive online community through
awareness and advocacy.
Education and Awareness
Educational programs play a pivotal role in curbing objectification by illuminating the
harmful repercussions of this behavior. Workshops and seminars provide platforms for open
discussions, fostering critical thinking and empathy. These programs aim to instill a profound
understanding of the impact on individuals and the broader community by delving into the
Yuetong 6
psychological, emotional, and societal consequences of objectification. Campaigns within
educational institutions can cultivate a culture of respect and inclusivity, encouraging online
users to challenge societal norms that perpetuate objectification.
Online Platforms’ Responsibility
Online platforms are crucial in combatting objectification by instituting robust policies
explicitly prohibiting such behavior. Enforcement mechanisms should be stringent, ensuring
swift action against perpetrators (Schwartz pg.25). Platforms must invest in advanced
technologies, including AI and content moderation tools, to proactively detect and prevent
objectifying content. By incorporating these measures, media can create safer digital spaces,
deterring the perpetuation of harmful content and fostering a culture of respect.
Community Engagement
Community engagement is instrumental in dismantling the culture of objectification. By
fostering a sense of community through open dialogues, individuals are encouraged to speak out
against objectification, creating a supportive environment for those who have experienced it.
Safe discussion spaces become a crucial platform for challenging harmful cultural norms
(Santoniccolo et al., pg.5770). These forums empower individuals to share their stories, raising
awareness about the pervasive issue of objectification. Through open dialogues, communities
can cultivate mutual respect, amplify voices against objectification, and pave the way for a
cultural shift towards inclusivity and empathy, ultimately fostering a society that values and
protects individual dignity.
Conclusion
Yuetong 7
In summary, my journey through online objectification is a poignant testament to the
urgent need for societal change. The pervasive impact of objectification, both online and offline,
is evident in the profound emotional distress it inflicts. Unmasking the enablers of objectification
reveals deeply ingrained cultural attitudes that demand transformation. This necessitates
educational initiatives to promote awareness and empathy, coupled with the accountability of
online platforms. A collective call to action urges us to challenge cultural norms, fostering a
society that values individual narratives and dismantles the damaging cycle of objectification.
We can strive for a more respectful and inclusive future through education, awareness, and
advocacy.
Yuetong 8
Works Cited
Coghlan, Simon, et al. “Dignity, autonomy, and company style: dimensions older adults consider
for robot companions.” Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 5.CSCW1
(2021): 1-25. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3449178
Santoniccolo, Fabrizio, et al. “Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on
Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization.” International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health 20.10 (2023): 5770. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5770
Schwartz, Meredith C. “Dignity, Respect, and Objectification.” Moral Respect, Objectification,
and Health Care, 2019, pp. 23-53. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-03002967-8.pdf
SELVAM, KOUSALYA. “Mother of Three Believed to Have Committed Suicide After Alleged
Cyber Bullying.” Sinar Daily, 9 Aug. 2022,
www.sinardaily.my/article/177853/malaysia/national/mother-of-three-believed-to-havecommitted-suicide-after-alleged-cyber-bullying.
Valente, Mariana. “No Place for Women: Gaps and challenges in promoting equality on social
media.” Constitutionalising Social Media, 2022, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509953738.ch-007
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
